Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:35:41 +0200
From:   Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To:     Victor Hsieh <victorhsieh@google.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
        v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/9p: Fix TCREATE's fid in protocol
Message-ID: <20200715133541.GA22828@nautica>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200715080358.GA2521386@kroah.com>
 <CAFCauYPo_3ztwbbexEJvdfDFCZgiake1L32cTc_Y_p4bDLr7zg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Victor Hsieh wrote on Tue, Jul 14, 2020:
> Please disregard this patch.  I misunderstood the protocol and have
> found the actual problem in the hypervisor's 9P implementation.  Sorry
> about the noise.

Ok, thanks for the notice.

Greg KH wrote on Wed, Jul 15, 2020:
> As Eric says, this is fine to cc: stable with this kind of thing.  It's
> good to get a "heads up" on patches that are coming, and Sasha runs some
> tests on them as well to make sure that they really are going to apply
> to what trees you think they should apply to.

Hmm, I'm really not sure how useful that is for first version of a patch
that actually got refused ;)
But if you both say it doesn't hurt I won't advise against it anymore,
thanks for correcting me.

-- 
Dominique