Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:41:55 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To:     Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 23 (objtool (2))
Message-ID: <20200715134155.GI20226@alley>
References: <20200623162820.3f45feae@canb.auug.org.au>
 <61df2e8f-75e8-d233-9c3c-5b4fa2b7fbdc@infradead.org>
 <20200702123555.bjioosahrs5vjovu@treble>
 <alpine.LSU.2.21.2007141240540.5393@pobox.suse.cz>
 <20200714135747.lcgysd5joguhssas@treble>
 <alpine.LSU.2.21.2007151250390.25290@pobox.suse.cz>
 <20200715121054.GH20226@alley>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200715121054.GH20226@alley>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed 2020-07-15 14:10:54, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2020-07-15 13:11:14, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > Petr, would you agree to revert -flive-patching.
> 
> Yes, I agree.

Or better to say that I will not block it.

I see that it causes maintenance burden. There are questions about
reliability and performance impact. I do not have a magic solution
in the pocket.

Anyway, we need a solution to know what functions need to get livepatched.
I do not have experience with comparing the assembly, so I do not know
how it is complicated and reliable.

Best Regards,
Petr