Received: by 2002:a25:e74b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e72csp692682ybh; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:39:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymm1Sd7CcebgYgiqGgvMY1fyMcFMqc+RQAr0OKyMNXzSzDRGIcnQ0XlMx6IbFSSN9cjG8M X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3152:: with SMTP id e18mr511158eje.137.1594841979017; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:39:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594841979; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lCqWl+O0+5N2u8cl0LftcqxDza+1Bx3bfS2mhwK26ZTmfIBlTn1s3IyhNIfYHLFN+J nGwH/guQyZ+/8L5JY0BX0teiN7RpocUHd7ReQhawnyLACFH02o9XjZ+15spjVSd0b9fX 7BJvnxgvtc2UjTyG/Zc6V5m5OBH2oWoSp0hIYdEHgjEKC0XReGiuK+MWMK//7WYsL/1B WCmNMpHTylObPajhRMWQJtLqKvqEhMrAK5TcEG/X/qsRXtTmDIFgFnwVP0UkxCfS0Lku HSs/HJADh+Xn12RrXdZ6O4dkuwCBIwb1QWaGDY3v8bU4S/jMtVR0/TCIABTMFFoND9+O qw4g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:date:from:dkim-signature; bh=/UQQ7JECYxcJsC+04YvXu3jkXwx9o0ZU8amBSOGyyL0=; b=lDbwmZ48qVXeWFOl26M7SmP+Zl4+xHTBhahCCuyRoeNJ5lPe9S2bbRCuO+9/b09pqS JpN4cN5Ckt9pZjdBbyHw8YfCtsEwtvXLZGZRReY8X51/C1Pr8RMqSYr37+dQLRhH6dh2 u++Blp2SIXJhAugJvVtXJnpjE+BjeMTp++5uceI2dYCRcd5T5akQVAzZXQEd+lD+HkS9 7TLYcoKeo+KiMJ1BlAAtTk3/FaWCc71utueTYHf3eZbeiVYom3A8msI12e6G6sEdj/ej uzaOhFv98IEV70BRV2K5eMaW9x9pCy877I6TLaFGrDRSGyIUyzNS3VYOO+gcFc7lB85q zPWQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=gvbGB7NA; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d18si1820595edv.274.2020.07.15.12.39.16; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=gvbGB7NA; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726998AbgGOThE (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:37:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42530 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726634AbgGOThC (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:37:02 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x142.google.com (mail-lf1-x142.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC89C061755; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x142.google.com with SMTP id y13so1719795lfe.9; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:37:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/UQQ7JECYxcJsC+04YvXu3jkXwx9o0ZU8amBSOGyyL0=; b=gvbGB7NAoQRARPoqxv9Cw9rm5EurTvOipDiLnb6iNSZzYaZbtuhDGwQLbpauTXguAd C+jHRBFUdxhSCfFghxodI4ckz6RBDCAXk1Tj7sBTds8+txIG5PEdKfgwfCWcjaQPWLWp g+erEo9033BpAGp2/xEB13F7l4nR9Uz3oUPR+HmUGwy6R1orIJi1m0bih0U/72ra69d+ F/zQBPKiaYzooX+8utpp7jGrm2VVP+1dUhmFTjnxvnHIDTg4hBN17XVgYzLnTTjWcADC 1gJGD+gyf51zCD13dM4kh46RTD1LuzJX4xh2bl33eWsWZdj5dX3L2OZVSenIoab3p048 u03w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/UQQ7JECYxcJsC+04YvXu3jkXwx9o0ZU8amBSOGyyL0=; b=JQ+ai5l1/r341wc9FHjkz6MfhWly3Vp7GplpvY6ZvAkaMIP2cEEOy1LEdt395B5WJ6 tTiH67ByGlZfNXN3AkjPNiefs7gRhk7s6X6g3/xYHwglbi3QK0aTXoGWq3zMCrXm4Ibn 8SGKXXJ1DiEPB00OGzqebV7pI6FgBu0IvWqwOAjVdH+L+GFItMCFNEol2NCp7yM4sZN8 F0Fwnfg82m371sWN1Q4pDOGfrfZ2qXhBA6iTpI5p8wdJG4Q8zjt8RY0X8/B73BK+WSR4 08u8HoX9E1/xrtCasbnaaKJpGFK+6Y/2d6lD5Ta7xQiZpyJViEanGd9bRMLr5ZOOSaOL aXiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532B1DaXw0qSi9+7TRW6RWc7eX+SbzHNTD30SU9w5I+IQVR4xH+U oq8lV4VwQ3IYINP/KIbSxZ4= X-Received: by 2002:a19:4a96:: with SMTP id x144mr269142lfa.213.1594841820710; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc636 (h5ef52e31.seluork.dyn.perspektivbredband.net. [94.245.46.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k3sm608184lji.125.2020.07.15.12.36.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:36:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:36:57 +0200 To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Uladzislau Rezki , LKML , RCU , linux-mm@kvack.org, "Paul E . McKenney" , Andrew Morton , "Theodore Y . Ts'o" , Matthew Wilcox , Joel Fernandes , Oleksiy Avramchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu/tree: Drop the lock before entering to page allocator Message-ID: <20200715193657.GB26938@pc636> References: <20200715183537.4010-1-urezki@gmail.com> <20200715185628.7b4k3o5efp4gnbla@linutronix.de> <20200715190243.GA26735@pc636> <20200715193250.axntj7jdt6bw52dr@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200715193250.axntj7jdt6bw52dr@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 09:32:50PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2020-07-15 21:02:43 [+0200], Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > > > > spin_lock(); > > __get_free_page(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN); > > spin_unlock(); > > > > > > Also, please note we do it for regular kernel. > > ach right okay then. > > > > > > > What happened to the part where I asked for a spinlock_t? > > > > > What do you mean? > > Please drop that raw_spinlock_t for the kfree_rcu() based locking and > use just a plain spinlock_t for the locking. Then you can keep the same > code flow for RT and !RT without any special cases and everything. > Ahhh... That i see :) I guess it is up to Paul. I wrote my thoughts. I have only one concern that i explained in my previous mails. Thank you, Sebastian, for your comments! -- Vlad Rezki