Received: by 2002:a25:e74b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e72csp1381841ybh; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 10:30:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRSf7QFundDIpHeFDYcBFwsPZ1Rge1Cw/haPUrcxvNfK1AiUXCQP2L2N57kxtXcqmqHW7s X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:6c4:: with SMTP id n4mr5645262edy.353.1594920609767; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 10:30:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594920609; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xF72dCEfpNuavIoOer7fGIhAS+BuOcl8LLoRx1Ox/+ZktGxxiVNw70EEpkd6lQFsh4 CMZ3UMzL6KLx/NFvVZ4Eps3FOYrjDOHZIPvu4R7XGq5OdPpNpRvTM6YbrF0sETfeIEBC g6PS7RqbfIQi0obudU+IlDNrXi6lmH0Dc6cQXDnZyWjZiQRVHCBtL8xzv/7hXiVnTzN1 k3a5sGP3JfnShvB+/iMv6oUMbutlBu1/5cKQ8A2A6nQIS0BKpJ5mO47NVCn27rxjvGaK rjEzWu1e58oiypFvURwDRxjoIV/zkphFdmGgS7GMyVV0JVGoh8GzOfSSBU9o0c9XHdXN lU6Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:organization:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=WtXuJ5Z7+wy+zAL9vLFxRECxmMt6j/XqUePoDyDLWq8=; b=OBHMPGWGvI8x1LQenatUYE2mQl/+YiLyItQ7BpxmGISbAGE3w4bsNUwkgf4lb6qB26 0c9Sogun7cHNhojYDeSsD40fRCu1qYu/v3DhkCNrAA3Rhd9BD90waWaz2SDsb9NeuEEd ScULbfX99WgZXTHqaC5u9ZVkbaXY8A8z9k55HDQqzx8UaS5dtwWJJ83nt3B/oK6OGFyS rciJ5igsENENbwroO0I46NKzgXcPPVleP0l18B0xJGCTwvQxxBvoh4quZj/k38u5Me2Q eNT832qnzKyb9niNIYn9i5yJUyagX3lHHB6kJxkPslPfX7e4RS6zOvneCf4NB1NeL2Kt Y+iw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w23si3709702eds.47.2020.07.16.10.29.47; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 10:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728721AbgGPR3W (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:29:22 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:7873 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726986AbgGPR3W (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:29:22 -0400 IronPort-SDR: 5lkEt/OtzlznKix64NnEgSenDZYx3RCkGLA7VRg4XE1Va6cQPhqst127pjno1v4xpgGJSRVz0R 9BM7pxcQAtiQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9684"; a="129528319" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,360,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="129528319" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2020 10:29:20 -0700 IronPort-SDR: LfkWassbIM0gQ+aOB8sk9xJi8DHpeZamMBTkcgIhGtULyGynPL+RHxVQV0IaHHxq2giIvjCO4B 479HADX8Zzkw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,360,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="325206120" Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([10.249.34.156]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2020 10:29:15 -0700 Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 20:29:13 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Tyler Hicks Cc: Peter Huewe , Ard Biesheuvel , Jason Gunthorpe , Petr Vandrovec , Nayna Jain , Thirupathaiah Annapureddy , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: Require that all digests are present in TCG_PCR_EVENT2 structures Message-ID: <20200716172913.GC14135@linux.intel.com> References: <20200710192955.23333-1-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> <20200713205719.GA1419951@linux.intel.com> <20200715155053.GA3673@sequoia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200715155053.GA3673@sequoia> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:50:53AM -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote: > On 2020-07-13 23:57:19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:29:55PM -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote: > > > Require that the TCG_PCR_EVENT2.digests.count value strictly matches the > > > value of TCG_EfiSpecIdEvent.numberOfAlgorithms in the event field of the > > > TCG_PCClientPCREvent event log header. Also require that > > > TCG_EfiSpecIdEvent.numberOfAlgorithms is non-zero. > > > > > > The TCG PC Client Platform Firmware Profile Specification section 9.1 > > > (Family "2.0", Level 00 Revision 1.04) states: > > > > > > For each Hash algorithm enumerated in the TCG_PCClientPCREvent entry, > > > there SHALL be a corresponding digest in all TCG_PCR_EVENT2 structures. > > > Note: This includes EV_NO_ACTION events which do not extend the PCR. > > > > > > Section 9.4.5.1 provides this description of > > > TCG_EfiSpecIdEvent.numberOfAlgorithms: > > > > > > The number of Hash algorithms in the digestSizes field. This field MUST > > > be set to a value of 0x01 or greater. > > > > > > Enforce these restrictions, as required by the above specification, in > > > order to better identify and ignore invalid sequences of bytes at the > > > end of an otherwise valid TPM2 event log. Firmware doesn't always have > > > the means necessary to inform the kernel of the actual event log size so > > > the kernel's event log parsing code should be stringent when parsing the > > > event log for resiliency against firmware bugs. This is true, for > > > example, when firmware passes the event log to the kernel via a reserved > > > memory region described in device tree. > > > > > > POWER and some ARM systems use the "linux,sml-base" and "linux,sml-size" > > > device tree properties to describe the memory region used to pass the > > > event log from firmware to the kernel. Unfortunately, the > > > "linux,sml-size" property describes the size of the entire reserved > > > memory region rather than the size of the event long within the memory > > > region and the event log format does not include information describing > > > the size of the event log. > > > > > > tpm_read_log_of(), in drivers/char/tpm/eventlog/of.c, is where the > > > "linux,sml-size" property is used. At the end of that function, > > > log->bios_event_log_end is pointing at the end of the reserved memory > > > region. That's typically 0x10000 bytes offset from "linux,sml-base", > > > depending on what's defined in the device tree source. > > > > > > The firmware event log only fills a portion of those 0x10000 bytes and > > > the rest of the memory region should be zeroed out by firmware. Even in > > > the case of a properly zeroed bytes in the remainder of the memory > > > region, the only thing allowing the kernel's event log parser to detect > > > the end of the event log is the following conditional in > > > __calc_tpm2_event_size(): > > > > > > if (event_type == 0 && event_field->event_size == 0) > > > size = 0; > > > > > > If that wasn't there, __calc_tpm2_event_size() would think that a 16 > > > byte sequence of zeroes, following an otherwise valid event log, was > > > a valid event. > > > > > > However, problems can occur if a single bit is set in the offset > > > corresponding to either the TCG_PCR_EVENT2.eventType or > > > TCG_PCR_EVENT2.eventSize fields, after the last valid event log entry. > > > This could confuse the parser into thinking that an additional entry is > > > present in the event log and exposing this invalid entry to userspace in > > > the /sys/kernel/security/tpm0/binary_bios_measurements file. Such > > > problems have been seen if firmware does not fully zero the memory > > > region upon a warm reboot. > > > > > > This patch significantly raises the bar on how difficult it is for > > > stale/invalid memory to confuse the kernel's event log parser but > > > there's still, ultimately, a reliance on firmware to properly initialize > > > the remainder of the memory region reserved for the event log as the > > > parser cannot be expected to detect a stale but otherwise properly > > > formatted firmware event log entry. > > > > > > Fixes: fd5c78694f3f ("tpm: fix handling of the TPM 2.0 event logs") > > > Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks > > > --- > > > > > > * v2 > > > - Rebase the patch on top of the TPM next branch, commit 786a2aa281f4 > > > ("Revert commit e918e570415c ("tpm_tis: Remove the HID IFX0102")") > > > - Expand on the technical reasoning for needing strict event > > > validation in the commit message > > > - Improve the inline comment explaining the need for detecting > > > malformed events > > > > > > include/linux/tpm_eventlog.h | 11 +++++++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/tpm_eventlog.h b/include/linux/tpm_eventlog.h > > > index 64356b199e94..739ba9a03ec1 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/tpm_eventlog.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/tpm_eventlog.h > > > @@ -211,9 +211,16 @@ static inline int __calc_tpm2_event_size(struct tcg_pcr_event2_head *event, > > > > > > efispecid = (struct tcg_efi_specid_event_head *)event_header->event; > > > > > > - /* Check if event is malformed. */ > > > + /* > > > + * Perform validation of the event in order to identify malformed > > > + * events. This function may be asked to parse arbitrary byte sequences > > > + * immediately following a valid event log. The caller expects this > > > + * function to recognize that the byte sequence is not a valid event > > > + * and to return an event size of 0. > > > + */ > > > if (memcmp(efispecid->signature, TCG_SPECID_SIG, > > > - sizeof(TCG_SPECID_SIG)) || count > efispecid->num_algs) { > > > + sizeof(TCG_SPECID_SIG)) || > > > + !efispecid->num_algs || count != efispecid->num_algs) { > > > size = 0; > > > goto out; > > > } > > > -- > > > 2.25.1 > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > > Thanks for the review. Do you plan to take this through the linux-tpmdd > tree or are you expecting someone else to pick up this patch? > > Tyler I'll pick it up before I send 5.9 PR. /Jarkko