Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200717171634.4b68472c@canb.auug.org.au> <1594976475.4688.2.camel@mtkswgap22>
In-Reply-To: <1594976475.4688.2.camel@mtkswgap22>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jul 2020 13:37:16 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbDS1_33cjTfnE8MT015r1YLcUOLtiAbvOBg5cUz5if1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree
To:     Hanks Chen <hanks.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Teng <andy.teng@mediatek.com>,
        Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@mediatek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:01 AM Hanks Chen <hanks.chen@mediatek.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-07-17 at 17:16 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> > Caused by commit
> >
> >   e6f744c6ad4f ("pinctrl: mediatek: add pinctrl support for MT6779 SoC")
> >
> > Forgot to include module.h (since it is tristate in Kconfig) or init.h?
> >
> > I used the pinctrl tree from next-20200716 for today.
> >
>
> My fault, I'll fix it in next version.
> (Series: Add basic SoC Support for Mediatek MT6779 SoC)

OK I pulled out all the MTK6779 patches from my tree and wait
for a new version.

Yours,
Linus Walleij