Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:24:47 -0500
From:   Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
To:     Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
        Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule
Message-ID: <20200717192447.GO3673@sequoia>
References: <20200709061911.954326-1-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20200709061911.954326-2-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
 <5ee27a51-7ff9-5763-c85f-e99e62458657@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <5ee27a51-7ff9-5763-c85f-e99e62458657@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2020-07-17 15:20:22, Nayna wrote:
> 
> On 7/9/20 2:19 AM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> > Ask the LSM to free its audit rule rather than directly calling kfree().
> 
> Is it to be called audit rule or filter rule ?? Likewise in subject line.

The security hooks call this "audit rule" but Mimi explained the
reasoning for IMA referring to this as an "audit filter" here:

 https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1593466203.5085.62.camel@linux.ibm.com/

I would be fine with her renaming/rewording this patch, accordingly, in
next-integrity-testing.

Tyler

> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> 
> ??? - Nayna