Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 02/12] security: add ipe lsm evaluation loop and
 audit system
To:     Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>, agk@redhat.com,
        axboe@kernel.dk, snitzer@redhat.com, jmorris@namei.org,
        serge@hallyn.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        paul@paul-moore.com, eparis@redhat.com, jannh@google.com,
        dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc:     tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        corbet@lwn.net, sashal@kernel.org,
        jaskarankhurana@linux.microsoft.com, mdsakib@microsoft.com,
        nramas@linux.microsoft.com, pasha.tatshin@soleen.com
References: <20200717230941.1190744-1-deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20200717230941.1190744-3-deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <4b0c9925-d163-46a2-bbcb-74deb7446540@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:16:43 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200717230941.1190744-3-deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 7/17/20 4:09 PM, Deven Bowers wrote:
> +config SECURITY_IPE_PERMISSIVE_SWITCH
> +	bool "Enable the ability to switch IPE to permissive mode"
> +	default y
> +	help
> +	  This option enables two ways of switching IPE to permissive mode,
> +	  a sysctl (if enabled), `ipe.enforce`, or a kernel command line
> +	  parameter, `ipe.enforce`. If either of these are set to 0, files

	                                               is set

> +	  will be subject to IPE's policy, audit messages will be logged, but
> +	  the policy will not be enforced.
> +
> +	  If unsure, answer Y.


-- 
~Randy