Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] task_put batching
Date:   Sat, 18 Jul 2020 11:32:50 +0300
Message-Id: <cover.1595021626.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

For my a bit exaggerated test case perf continues to show high CPU
cosumption by io_dismantle(), and so calling it io_iopoll_complete().
Even though the patch doesn't yield throughput increase for my setup,
probably because the effect is hidden behind polling, but it definitely
improves relative percentage. And the difference should only grow with
increasing number of CPUs. Another reason to have this is that atomics
may affect other parallel tasks (e.g. which doesn't use io_uring)

before:
io_iopoll_complete: 5.29%
io_dismantle_req:   2.16%

after:
io_iopoll_complete: 3.39%
io_dismantle_req:   0.465%


Pavel Begunkov (2):
  tasks: add put_task_struct_many()
  io_uring: batch put_task_struct()

 fs/io_uring.c              | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/sched/task.h |  6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.24.0