Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/15] vfio/type1: Add VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST
 (alloc/free)
To:     Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
        baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, joro@8bytes.org
Cc:     kevin.tian@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com,
        ashok.raj@intel.com, jun.j.tian@intel.com, yi.y.sun@intel.com,
        jean-philippe@linaro.org, peterx@redhat.com, hao.wu@intel.com,
        stefanha@gmail.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <1594552870-55687-1-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@intel.com>
 <1594552870-55687-8-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@intel.com>
From:   Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <6199a51b-3459-c596-e651-bb30d3b3d645@redhat.com>
Date:   Sun, 19 Jul 2020 17:38:53 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1594552870-55687-8-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Yi,

On 7/12/20 1:21 PM, Liu Yi L wrote:
> This patch allows user space to request PASID allocation/free, e.g. when
> serving the request from the guest.
> 
> PASIDs that are not freed by userspace are automatically freed when the
> IOASID set is destroyed when process exits.
> 
> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> CC: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
> Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> v4 -> v5:
> *) address comments from Eric Auger.
> *) the comments for the PASID_FREE request is addressed in patch 5/15 of
>    this series.
> 
> v3 -> v4:
> *) address comments from v3, except the below comment against the range
>    of PASID_FREE request. needs more help on it.
>     "> +if (req.range.min > req.range.max)
> 
>     Is it exploitable that a user can spin the kernel for a long time in
>     the case of a free by calling this with [0, MAX_UINT] regardless of
>     their actual allocations?"
>     https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200702151832.048b44d1@x1.home/
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> *) move the vfio_mm related code to be a seprate module
> *) use a single structure for alloc/free, could support a range of PASIDs
> *) fetch vfio_mm at group_attach time instead of at iommu driver open time
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/Kconfig            |  1 +
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c       | 10 +++++
>  include/linux/vfio.h            |  6 +++
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h       | 37 ++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 139 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> index 3d8a108..95d90c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>  config VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1
>  	tristate
>  	depends on VFIO
> +	select VFIO_PASID if (X86)
>  	default n
>  
>  config VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index ed80104..55b4065 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct vfio_iommu {
>  	bool				dirty_page_tracking;
>  	bool				pinned_page_dirty_scope;
>  	struct iommu_nesting_info	*nesting_info;
> +	struct vfio_mm			*vmm;
>  };
>  
>  struct vfio_domain {
> @@ -1937,6 +1938,11 @@ static void vfio_iommu_iova_insert_copy(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  
>  static void vfio_iommu_release_nesting_info(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>  {
> +	if (iommu->vmm) {
> +		vfio_mm_put(iommu->vmm);
> +		iommu->vmm = NULL;
> +	}
> +
>  	kfree(iommu->nesting_info);
>  	iommu->nesting_info = NULL;
>  }
> @@ -2071,6 +2077,26 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
>  					    iommu->nesting_info);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto out_detach;
> +
> +		if (iommu->nesting_info->features &
> +					IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_SYSWIDE_PASID) {
> +			struct vfio_mm *vmm;
> +			int sid;
> +
> +			vmm = vfio_mm_get_from_task(current);
> +			if (IS_ERR(vmm)) {
> +				ret = PTR_ERR(vmm);
> +				goto out_detach;
> +			}
> +			iommu->vmm = vmm;
> +
> +			sid = vfio_mm_ioasid_sid(vmm);
> +			ret = iommu_domain_set_attr(domain->domain,
> +						    DOMAIN_ATTR_IOASID_SID,
> +						    &sid);
> +			if (ret)
> +				goto out_detach;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Get aperture info */
> @@ -2855,6 +2881,63 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_pages(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> +static int vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> +					unsigned int min,
> +					unsigned int max)
> +{
> +	int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> +	if (iommu->vmm)
> +		ret = vfio_pasid_alloc(iommu->vmm, min, max);
> +	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_free(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> +				       unsigned int min,
> +				       unsigned int max)
> +{
> +	int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> +	if (iommu->vmm) {
> +		vfio_pasid_free_range(iommu->vmm, min, max);
> +		ret = 0;
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> +					  unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request req;
> +	unsigned long minsz;
> +
> +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request, range);
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&req, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (req.argsz < minsz || (req.flags & ~VFIO_PASID_REQUEST_MASK))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (req.range.min > req.range.max)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	switch (req.flags & VFIO_PASID_REQUEST_MASK) {
> +	case VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID:not sure it is worth to introduce both vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_free/alloc
helpers. You could take the lock above, and test iommu->vmm as well above.
> +		return vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_alloc(iommu,
> +					req.range.min, req.range.max);
> +	case VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID:
> +		return vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_free(iommu,
> +					req.range.min, req.range.max);
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  				   unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  {
> @@ -2871,6 +2954,8 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  		return vfio_iommu_type1_unmap_dma(iommu, arg);
>  	case VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES:
>  		return vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_pages(iommu, arg);
> +	case VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST:
> +		return vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request(iommu, arg);
>  	default:
>  		return -ENOTTY;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c
> index 66e6054e..ebec244 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ void vfio_mm_put(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
>  {
>  	kref_put_mutex(&vmm->kref, vfio_mm_release, &vfio_mm_lock);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_mm_put);
>  
>  static void vfio_mm_get(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
>  {
> @@ -114,6 +115,13 @@ struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm_get_from_task(struct task_struct *task)
>  	mmput(mm);
>  	return vmm;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_mm_get_from_task);
> +
> +int vfio_mm_ioasid_sid(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
> +{
> +	return vmm->ioasid_sid;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_mm_ioasid_sid);
>  
>  /*
>   * Find PASID within @min and @max
> @@ -197,6 +205,7 @@ int vfio_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_mm *vmm, int min, int max)
>  
>  	return pasid;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pasid_alloc);
>  
>  void vfio_pasid_free_range(struct vfio_mm *vmm,
>  			   ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max)
> @@ -213,6 +222,7 @@ void vfio_pasid_free_range(struct vfio_mm *vmm,
>  		vfio_remove_pasid(vmm, vid);
>  	mutex_unlock(&vmm->pasid_lock);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pasid_free_range);
>  
>  static int __init vfio_pasid_init(void)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> index 31472a9..a111108 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct vfio_mm;
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PASID)
>  extern struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm_get_from_task(struct task_struct *task);
>  extern void vfio_mm_put(struct vfio_mm *vmm);
> +int vfio_mm_ioasid_sid(struct vfio_mm *vmm);
I still don't get why it does not take an extern as the other functions
implemented in vfio_pasid.c and used in other modules. what's the
difference?
>  extern int vfio_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_mm *vmm, int min, int max);
>  extern void vfio_pasid_free_range(struct vfio_mm *vmm,
>  				  ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max);
> @@ -114,6 +115,11 @@ static inline void vfio_mm_put(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
>  {
>  }
>  
> +static inline int vfio_mm_ioasid_sid(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
> +{
> +	return -ENOTTY;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int vfio_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_mm *vmm, int min, int max)
>  {
>  	return -ENOTTY;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index 46a78af..96a115f 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -1172,6 +1172,43 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_bitmap_get {
>  
>  #define VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES             _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 17)
>  
> +/**
> + * VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 18,
> + *				struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request)
> + *
> + * PASID (Processor Address Space ID) is a PCIe concept for tagging
> + * address spaces in DMA requests. When system-wide PASID allocation
> + * is required by underlying iommu driver (e.g. Intel VT-d), this
by the underlying
> + * provides an interface for userspace to request pasid alloc/free
> + * for its assigned devices. Userspace should check the availability
> + * of this API by checking VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_NESTING through
> + * VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO.
> + *
> + * @flags=VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID, allocate a single PASID within @range.
> + * @flags=VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID, free the PASIDs within @range.
> + * @range is [min, max], which means both @min and @max are inclusive.
> + * ALLOC_PASID and FREE_PASID are mutually exclusive.
> + *
> + * returns: allocated PASID value on success, -errno on failure for
> + *	     ALLOC_PASID;
> + *	     0 for FREE_PASID operation;
> + */
> +struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request {
> +	__u32	argsz;
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID	(1 << 0)
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID	(1 << 1)
> +	__u32	flags;
> +	struct {
> +		__u32	min;
> +		__u32	max;
> +	} range;
> +};
> +
> +#define VFIO_PASID_REQUEST_MASK	(VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID | \
> +					 VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID)
> +
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST	_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 18)
> +
>  /* -------- Additional API for SPAPR TCE (Server POWERPC) IOMMU -------- */
>  
>  /*
> 
Otherwise, besides the pieces I would have put directly in the
vfio_pasid module patch (EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL and vfio_mm_ioasid_sid),
looks good.

Thanks

Eric