Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sun, 19 Jul 2020 23:05:31 +0530
From:   Suraj Upadhyay <usuraj35@gmail.com>
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
        linux-decnet-user@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net: decnet: TODO Items
Message-ID: <20200719173531.GA8585@blackclown>
References: <20200717061816.GA12159@blackclown>
 <20200719100649.3719add8@hermes.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200719100649.3719add8@hermes.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 10:06:49AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:48:16 +0530
> Suraj Upadhyay <usuraj35@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Maintainers and Developers,
> > 	I am interested in the DECnet TODO list.
> > I just need a quick response whether they are worth doing or not
> > for the amount of development happening in this subsystem is extremely
> > low and I can't help but question whether I should indulge in any of
> > the listed works or not.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Suraj Upadhyay.
> > 
> 
> The was a push to move decnet into staging and kill it.
> But last time there were still some users.

It's understandable that it has grown obsolete now.

Thanks for your response.

Suraj Upadhyay.