Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932334AbWEHGR5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2006 02:17:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932337AbWEHGR5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2006 02:17:57 -0400 Received: from S010600138f6abc78.vc.shawcable.net ([24.85.144.67]:8383 "EHLO montezuma.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932334AbWEHGR4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2006 02:17:56 -0400 Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:17:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Shaohua Li cc: lkml , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Ashok Raj , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/10] make some arch depend routines accept cpumask In-Reply-To: <1147067142.2760.80.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <1147067142.2760.80.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 554 Lines: 18 On Mon, 8 May 2006, Shaohua Li wrote: > +int __cpuexit __cpu_disable(cpumask_t remove_mask) > { > unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); > struct task_struct *p; > int ret; > > + BUG_ON(cpus_weight(remove_mask) != 1); > ret = mach_cpu_disable(cpu); What is this extra argument actually used for? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/