Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:17:40 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 13/17] kmap: Add stray write protection for device
 pages
Message-ID: <20200720091740.GP10769@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20200717072056.73134-1-ira.weiny@intel.com>
 <20200717072056.73134-14-ira.weiny@intel.com>
 <20200717092139.GC10769@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20200719041319.GA478573@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200719041319.GA478573@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 09:13:19PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:21:39AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:20:52AM -0700, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> > > @@ -31,6 +32,20 @@ static inline void invalidate_kernel_vmap_range(void *vaddr, int size)
> > >  
> > >  #include <asm/kmap_types.h>
> > >  
> > > +static inline void enable_access(struct page *page)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (!page_is_access_protected(page))
> > > +		return;
> > > +	dev_access_enable();
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void disable_access(struct page *page)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (!page_is_access_protected(page))
> > > +		return;
> > > +	dev_access_disable();
> > > +}
> > 
> > These are some very generic names, do we want them to be a little more
> > specific?
> 
> I had them named kmap_* but Dave (I think it was Dave) thought they did not
> really apply strictly to kmap_*.
> 
> They are static to this file which I thought may be sufficient to 'uniqify'
> them?

They're static to a .h, which means they're all over the place ;-)