Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200717115435.2632623-1-helen.koike@collabora.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200717115435.2632623-1-helen.koike@collabora.com>
From:   Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:57:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5DztxOZTCVzYDguB7+_njRGEOb8Nsno0VK=r=oJM=yJKw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] media: v4l2: Add extended fmt and buffer ioctls
To:     Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
        Hirokazu Honda <hiroh@chromium.org>,
        Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@ndufresne.ca>,
        Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>, kernel@collabora.com,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        frkoenig@chromium.org, Maxime Jourdan <mjourdan@baylibre.com>,
        Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Helen,

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 1:55 PM Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry for taking too long to submit v4.
>
> It is not perfect, not all v4l2-compliance tests passes, but I'd like a review,
> specially on the API and potential problems, so I can focus on improving implementation
> and maybe drop the RFC tag for next version.
>
> Follow below what changed in v4 and some items I'd like to discuss:
>
>
> * Ioctl to replace v4l2_pix_format
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> During last media summit, we agreed to create ioctls that replace the v4l2_pix_format
> struct and leave the other structs in the v4l2_format union alone.
> Thus I refactored the code to receive struct v4l2_ext_pix_format, and I renamed the
> ioctls, so now we have:
>
> int ioctl(int fd, VIDIOC_G_EXT_FMT, struct v4l2_ext_pix_format *argp);
> int ioctl(int fd, VIDIOC_S_EXT_FMT, struct v4l2_ext_pix_format *argp);
> int ioctl(int fd, VIDIOC_TRY_EXT_FMT, struct v4l2_ext_pix_format *argp);
>
> The only valid types are V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE and V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT,
> all the other types are invalid with this API.
>
>
> * Modifiers
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> I understand that unifying DRM and V4L2 pixel formats is not possible, but I'd like
> to unify the modifiers [1].
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h#n290
>
> Should we use the DRM modifiers directly in the V4L2 API?
> Or should we move this header to a common place and change the prefix? (which requires
> us to sync with DRM community).
> Or should we create a v4l2 header, defining V4L2_ prefixed macros mapping to DRM_
> macros?
>
> For now, patch 1/6 includes drm/drm_fourcc.h and it is using DRM_FORMAT_MOD_*
>
> As discussed before, It would be nice to have documentation describing DRM fourcc
> equivalents (I'm not sure if someone started this already), listing the number of
> planes per format.
>
> We should also document which pixelformats are valid for the EXT_API, since multiplanar
> and tile versions like V4L2_PIX_FMT_NV12MT_16X16 (which seems equivalent to
> DRM_FORMAT_MOD_SAMSUNG_16_16_TILE, and could have a more generic name) should be
> replaced by a modifier.
>
> Regarding flags [2] field in struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane [3]:
> The only defined flag is V4L2_PIX_FMT_FLAG_PREMUL_ALPHA, and it is only used by vsp1 driver.
> Which I believe could be replaced by a modifier, to avoid another field that changes
> pixel formats, so I removed it from the EXT API (we can always add it back later with
> the reserved fields).
>
> [2] https://linuxtv.org/downloads/v4l-dvb-apis-new/userspace-api/v4l/pixfmt-reserved.html#format-flags
> [3] https://linuxtv.org/downloads/v4l-dvb-apis-new/userspace-api/v4l/pixfmt-v4l2-mplane.html?highlight=v4l2_pix_format_mplane#c.v4l2_pix_format_mplane
>
> We also discussed to add a new ENUM_FMT_EXT ioctl to return all pixelformats + modifiers
> combinations. I still didn't add it in this version, but I don't think it affects
> what is in this RFC and it can be added later.
>
>
> * Buffers/Plane offset
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> My understanding is that inside a memory buffer we can have multiple planes in random
> offsets.
> I was comparing with the DRM API [4], where it can have the same dmabuf for multiple
> planes in different offsets, and I started to think we could simplify our API, so
> I took the liberty to do some more changes, please review struct v4l2_ext_plane in
> this RFC.
>
> I removed the data_offset, since it is unused (See Laurent's RFC repurposing this
> field [5]). And comparing to the DRM API, it seems to me we only need a single offset
> field.
>
> We could also check about overlapping planes in a memory buffer, but this is complicated
> if we use the same memory buffer with different v4l2_ext_buffer objects. We can also leave
> to the driver to check situations that may cause HW errors.
>
> [4] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h#n489
> [5] https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/29177/
>
>
> * Multistream Channels
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> During last media summit, we discussed about adding a channel number to the API to
> support multistreams. i.e, to have multiple queues through a single video node.
>
> Use cases:
>
>     - Blitters: can take multiple streams as input, which would require multiple OUTPUT queues.
>
>     As Nicolas was explaining me:
>     "The blitters comes with a lot of variation between hardware. Most blitters at
>     least support 3 frames buffer. 2 inputs and one output. The second input is usually
>     optional, as the output buffer data is not always overwritten (e.g. SRC_OVER
>     blend or 1 input). Some of them have additional solid color or pattern that can
>     be used too. Advanced blitters will have composition feature, and may support more
>     input buffers to reduce the added latency that would be normally done through cascading
>     the operations. Note that each input can have different size and different cropping
>     region. Many blitters can scale and render to a sub-region of the CAPTURE buffer."
>
>     - Multis-calers: can produce multiple streams, which would require multiple CAPTURE queues.
>
>     As Nicolas was explaining me:
>     "This type of HW (or soft IP) is commonly found on HW used to produce internet
>     streams for fragmented and scalable protocols (HLS, DASH).  Basically they are
>     used to transform one stream into multiple sized streams prior from being encoded."
>
> Modeling as channels allows the API to have synchronized Start/Stop between queues,
> and also avoid the complexity of using the Media API in a topology with multiple video
> nodes, which complicates userspace.
>
> This requires adding a new channel id in ioctls for formats (G_FMT/S_FMT/TRY_FMT), and
> also for buffers (QBUF/DBUF).
> We also need a mechanism to enumerate channels and their properties.
> Since we don't have a clear view how this would work, for now I'm leaving reserved bits
> in the structs, so we can add them later.
>
>
> * Timecode
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> During last media summit, we discussed to return the v4l2_timecode field to the API,
> since Nicolas mentioned that, even if it is not used by any upstreamed driver, it
> is used by out-of-tree drivers.
>
> I've been discussing with Nicolas about this, and we can avoid adding too many metadata
> to the buffer struct by using the Read-Only Request API [6] for retrieving more information
> when required, similar to HDR.
>
> The RO Request API has the ability to read a control using a request that has already
> completed, the control value lives as long as the request object. If it's not read
> (or if there was no request), the data is simply ignored/discard.
>
> Since no upstream driver uses the timecode field, there are no conversions that need
> to be done.
>
> [6] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11635927/
>
>
> * Other changes (and some questions) in this version:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> - Added reserved fields to struct
>
> - The only difference between previously proposed VIDIOC_EXT_EXPBUF and VIDIOC_EXPBUF,
> was that with VIDIOC_EXT_EXPBUF we can export multiple planes at once. I think we
> can add this later, so I removed it from this RFC to simplify it.
>
> - v4l2_buffer [7] has a memory field (enum v4l2_memory [8]). We kept this field in
> struct v4l2_ext_buffer, buf I was wondering if this shouldn't be in struct v4l2_ext_plane
> instead.
>
> [7] https://linuxtv.org/downloads/v4l-dvb-apis-new/userspace-api/v4l/buffer.html?highlight=v4l2_buffer#c.v4l2_buffer
> [8] https://linuxtv.org/downloads/v4l-dvb-apis-new/userspace-api/v4l/buffer.html?highlight=v4l2_memory#c.v4l2_memory
>
> - In struct v4l2_ext_pix_format, we have:
>
>         struct v4l2_plane_ext_pix_format plane_fmt[VIDEO_MAX_PLANES];
>
> The number of planes can be deducted from plane_fmt[i].sizeimage != 0, so I removed
> the num_planes field. Please let me know if we can't use sizeimage for this.
> In DRM, we know the number of planes from drm_mode_fb_cmd2 by the number of handle
> args passed which are not 0.
> This also avoids num_planes to be bigger then VIDEO_MAX_PLANES.
>
> - Added flags field to struct v4l2_ext_create_buffers
>
>
> * Fixed bugs here and there
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> I fixed some bugs found with v4l2-compliance (not all of them yet),
> through script v4l-utils/contrib/test/test-media.
>
> I adapted what Boris did for v4l-utils in previous version to this version:
> https://gitlab.collabora.com/koike/v4l-utils/-/tree/ext-api/wip
>
> Boris' questions regarding DMABUF in last version still holds [9].
>
> [9] https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/cover/20191008091119.7294-1-boris.brezillon@collabora.com/
>
>
> Please, let me know your feedback,
> Helen
>
>
> Boris Brezillon (5):
>   media: v4l2: Extend pixel formats to unify single/multi-planar
>     handling (and more)
>   media: videobuf2: Expose helpers to implement the _ext_fmt and
>     _ext_buf hooks
>   media: mediabus: Add helpers to convert a ext_pix format to/from a
>     mbus_fmt
>   media: vivid: Convert the capture and output drivers to
>     EXT_FMT/EXT_BUF
>   media: vimc: Implement the ext_fmt and ext_buf hooks
>
> Hans Verkuil (1):
>   media: v4l2: Add extended buffer operations
>
>  .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c   |   2 +
>  .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c   | 549 +++++-----
>  .../media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-capture.c    |  61 +-
>  drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-common.c |   6 +-
>  drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-common.h |   2 +-
>  drivers/media/test-drivers/vivid/vivid-core.c |  70 +-
>  .../test-drivers/vivid/vivid-touch-cap.c      |  26 +-
>  .../test-drivers/vivid/vivid-touch-cap.h      |   3 +-
>  .../media/test-drivers/vivid/vivid-vid-cap.c  | 169 +---
>  .../media/test-drivers/vivid/vivid-vid-cap.h  |  15 +-
>  .../media/test-drivers/vivid/vivid-vid-out.c  | 193 ++--
>  .../media/test-drivers/vivid/vivid-vid-out.h  |  15 +-
>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c            |  50 +-
>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c          | 934 ++++++++++++++++--
>  include/media/v4l2-ioctl.h                    |  60 ++
>  include/media/v4l2-mediabus.h                 |  42 +
>  include/media/videobuf2-core.h                |   6 +-
>  include/media/videobuf2-v4l2.h                |  21 +-
>  include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h                | 144 +++
>  19 files changed, 1650 insertions(+), 718 deletions(-)

I don't see any documentation being added by this series. I think it's
been a long standing issue with this series and makes it difficult to
review the UAPI itself, in separation from the kernel implementation
details, which is especially important for any non-kernel developers
willing to provide feedback.

Best regards,
Tomasz