Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: compress: Avoid memory leak on
 cc->cpages
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
CC:     <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
References: <6074306e-e909-e17f-900c-320245a8f869@web.de>
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <8be91065-7c85-9501-f1c2-3cf11aab85a5@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:38:14 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6074306e-e909-e17f-900c-320245a8f869@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2020/7/20 19:31, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Memory allocated for storing compressed pages' poitner should be
>> released after f2fs_write_compressed_pages(), otherwise it will
>> cause memory leak issue.
> 
> * Would an imperative wording be more appropriate (without a typo)
>    for the change description?
> 
> * Will the tag “Fixes” become helpful for the commit message?

It looks this is replied from patch-robot? since I found all comments
you replied are almost the same.

And what's funny is that the reply starts being caught by another patch-bot
from Greg...

https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/28/157

> 
> Regards,
> Markus
> .
>