Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932367AbWEHQfB (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2006 12:35:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932409AbWEHQfB (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2006 12:35:01 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:42767 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932367AbWEHQfA (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2006 12:35:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:34:53 +0100 From: Russell King To: Andrew Morton Cc: Andreas Mohr , florin@iucha.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux@dominikbrodowski.net Subject: Re: pcmcia oops on 2.6.17-rc[12] Message-ID: <20060508163453.GB19040@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton , Andreas Mohr , florin@iucha.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux@dominikbrodowski.net References: <20060423192251.GD8896@iucha.net> <20060423150206.546b7483.akpm@osdl.org> <20060508145609.GA3983@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> <20060508084301.5025b25d.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060508084301.5025b25d.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2454 Lines: 59 On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 08:43:01AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Andreas Mohr wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 03:02:06PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > It's actually not an oops - it's a warning, telling us that i82365 is > > > requesting an IRQ in non-sharing mode, but there's already a handler > > > registered for that IRQ (which might or might not be shareable). > > > > And the same thing on a Toshiba Satellite 4280, P3/450, 2.6.17-rc3-ck2: > > > > setup_irq: irq handler mismatch > > show_trace+0xd/0xf dump_stack+0x15/0x17 > > setup_irq+0xd9/0xe8 request_irq+0x6e/0x8c > > serial8250_startup+0x263/0x394 uart_startup+0x68/0xf1 > > uart_ioctl+0x554/0x847 tty_ioctl+0xbae/0xc36 > > do_ioctl+0x3c/0x4f vfs_ioctl+0x1ee/0x205 > > sys_ioctl+0x2a/0x44 sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75 Hmm, someone's fiddling with setserial here... > > # cat /proc/interrupts > > CPU0 > > 0: 31607214 XT-PIC timer > > 1: 11092 XT-PIC i8042 > > 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade > > 3: 36368 XT-PIC pcnet_cs > > 8: 3 XT-PIC rtc > > 9: 84 XT-PIC acpi > > 11: 73639 XT-PIC yenta, yenta, uhci_hcd:usb1, YMFPCI, irda0 > > 12: 9996 XT-PIC i8042 > > 14: 63830 XT-PIC ide0 > > 15: 536942 XT-PIC ide1 > > NMI: 0 > > LOC: 0 > > ERR: 0 > > So 8250 is requesting an IRQ for non-sharing mode and it's actually > failing, because something else is already using that IRQ. The difference > is that the kernel now generates a warning when this happens. Maybe someone is clearing the UPF_SHARE_IRQ flag? Which port is this? > Russell, any opinions? I'd like to get a better idea what's going on here. Is this a port on a PCMCIA card? Is it a motherboard serial port? Which IRQ is it trying to use? How was it setup? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/