Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 23:27:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 23:27:21 -0400 Received: from queen.bee.lk ([203.143.12.182]:13441 "EHLO queen.bee.lk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 23:27:15 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 09:28:02 +0600 From: Anuradha Ratnaweera To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: i@stringr.net Subject: Re: Other computers HIGHLY degrading network performance (DoS?) Message-ID: <20011027092802.A2651@bee.lk> In-Reply-To: <20011026084328.A14814@bee.lk> <1004064922.21997.7.camel@Eleusis> <20011026090505.A15880@bee.lk> <20011026101313.A18310@bee.lk> <20011026145621.J41175@stingr.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011026145621.J41175@stingr.net>; from i@stingr.net on Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 02:56:21PM +0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 02:56:21PM +0400, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote: > > Replying to Anuradha Ratnaweera: > > Just found out that this is _not_ a problem of the "download accelerator", but > > something to do with queuing algorithm of the router. Even a normal wget > > process or a big mail has a big impart on the network. Hopefully an iptables > > firewall would solve the problem. > > Router hardware // software ?? Software. It is a linux based propiatory product, and we don't have control over it. Regards, Anuradha -- Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.13) The easiest way to figure the cost of living is to take your income and add ten percent. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/