Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:49:12 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To:     "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        "Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/24] seqlock: Extend seqcount API with associated
 locks
Message-ID: <20200720164912.GC1292162@gmail.com>
References: <20200519214547.352050-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de>
 <20200720155530.1173732-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200720155530.1173732-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 05:55:06PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is v4 of the seqlock patch series:
> 
>    [PATCH v1 00/25]
>    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200519214547.352050-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de
> 
>    [PATCH v2 00/06] (bugfixes-only, merged)
>    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603144949.1122421-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de
> 
>    [PATCH v2 00/18]
>    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200608005729.1874024-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de
> 
>    [PATCH v3 00/20]
>    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200630054452.3675847-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de
> 
> It is based over:
> 
>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git :: locking/core
> 

Please include an explanation of the patch series in the cover letter.  It looks
like you sent it in v1 and then stopped including it.  That doesn't work;
reviewers shouldn't have to read all previous versions too and try to guess
which parts are still up-to-date.

- Eric