Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add common TI SCI rproc
 bindings
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
CC:     Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com>
 <20200717234800.9423-4-s-anna@ti.com> <20200720221718.GA2899451@bogus>
From:   Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Message-ID: <4968835e-2ba5-dcd8-93b9-c3e33aabb0a9@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:26:26 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200720221718.GA2899451@bogus>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 7/20/20 5:17 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:47:57 -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
>> Add a bindings document that lists the common TI SCI properties
>> used by the K3 R5F and DSP remoteproc devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>> ---
>> v4: Addressed both of Rob's review comments on ti,sci-proc-ids property
>> v3: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11602317/
>>
>>   .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml   | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml
>>
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Rob,

You seem to have added your Reviewed-by tag by mistake on this 
particular patch [1], that's why I actually dropped it.

I do use pwclient, so the tags do get picked up automatically for my 
newer versions.

regards
Suman

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/comment/23484127/