Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:54:37 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To:     "Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@al2klimov.de>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com,
        davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for v5.9] RDS: Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones
Message-ID: <20200721085437.GL1080481@unreal>
References: <20200719155845.59947-1-grandmaster@al2klimov.de>
 <20200720045626.GF127306@unreal>
 <20200720075848.26bc3dfe@lwn.net>
 <20200720140716.GB1080481@unreal>
 <20200720083635.3e7880ce@lwn.net>
 <20200720164827.GC1080481@unreal>
 <c78d0958-c4ef-9754-c189-ffc507ca1340@al2klimov.de>
 <20200721060529.GF1080481@unreal>
 <f1df7901-35ef-af8a-b852-e5e89ababf01@al2klimov.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f1df7901-35ef-af8a-b852-e5e89ababf01@al2klimov.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 08:43:00AM +0200, Alexander A. Klimov wrote:
>
>
> Am 21.07.20 um 08:05 schrieb Leon Romanovsky:
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:34:00PM +0200, Alexander A. Klimov wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 20.07.20 um 18:48 schrieb Leon Romanovsky:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 08:36:35AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:07:16 +0300
> > > > > Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Do *you* want to review that megapatch?  The number of issues that have
> > > This question is... interesting.
> > > And no, I would not.
> >
> > You are EXPECTED to review your work prior sending to the mailing list.
> I meant I wouldn't review *one big* patch.
> I didn't mean my actually sent smaller ones.
>
> >
> > >
> > > > > > > come up make it clear that these patches do, indeed, need review...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can you point me to the issues?
> > > > > > What can go wrong with such a simple replacement?
> > > > >
> > > > > Some bits of the conversation:
> > > > >
> > > > >     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200626110219.7ae21265@lwn.net/
> > > > >     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200626110706.7b5d4a38@lwn.net/
> > > > >     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200705142506.1f26a7e0@lwn.net/
> > > > >     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200713114321.783f0ae6@lwn.net/
> > > > >     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202007081531.085533FC5@keescook/
> > > > >
> > > > > etc.
> > > >
> > > > After reading your links and especially this one.
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200713114321.783f0ae6@lwn.net/
> > > > I don't understand why are we still seeing these patches?
> > > >
> > > > I gave to the author comments too, which were ignored.
> > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11644683/#23466547
> > > I've added SPDXing (the automated way of course ;) ) to my todo list.
> >
> > OMG, why don't you listen? We don't want your automatic patches.
> Wrong.
> *Some of you* don't want my automatic patches.
> And *some others* already applied them and said thanks.

Sure, it is automatic.

Anyway, good luck, may the force be with you!.

Thanks

>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > jon