Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200704122809.73794-1-konradybcio@gmail.com> <20200704130922.GB21333@willie-the-truck>
 <20200705033511.GR388985@builder.lan> <CAMS8qEWO-1mNd12Zs-2WogCrgNF5=6RkF=Z1pTeOZxSuKjx+qg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200721154415.GA5758@jcrouse1-lnx.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200721154415.GA5758@jcrouse1-lnx.qualcomm.com>
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:20:29 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMS8qEXNh6n9SpMkPAr8cPneasPvJPELD2TZ4gxUf0byxNePbg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement qcom,skip-init
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, skrzynka@konradybcio.pl,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

>The current
>focus has been on moving more of the SMMU specific bits into the arm-smmu-qcom
>implementation [1] and I think that is the right way to go.

Pardon if I overlooked something obvious, but I can't seem to find a
clean way for implementing qcom,skip-init in arm-smmu-qcom, as neither
the arm_smmu_test_smr_masks nor the probe function seem to be
alterable with arm_smmu_impl. I'm open to your ideas guys.

Konrad