Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751298AbWEIOp2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2006 10:45:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751384AbWEIOp2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2006 10:45:28 -0400 Received: from prgy-npn2.prodigy.com ([207.115.54.38]:64727 "EHLO oddball.prodigy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751298AbWEIOp1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2006 10:45:27 -0400 Message-ID: <445F95DC.4050109@tmr.com> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:02:52 -0400 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060409 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alistair John Strachan CC: Nigel Cunningham , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16.14 References: <20060505003526.GW24291@moss.sous-sol.org> <200605051152.39693.ncunningham@cyclades.com> <20060505023353.GA24291@moss.sous-sol.org> <200605050347.51703.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <200605050347.51703.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1434 Lines: 32 Alistair John Strachan wrote: > On Friday 05 May 2006 03:33, Chris Wright wrote: >> * Nigel Cunningham (ncunningham@cyclades.com) wrote: >>> Is this supposed to be some sort of subtle pressure on Linus to open 2.7? >>> :> >> He does every couple months and leaves it open for a few weeks. >> Then, just to keep us guessing, he releases it with a 2.6 name ;-) >> >> Actually, I think the system is working quite well. We've got a quick >> route for getting bug fixes and security fixes to users, and a shorter >> devel cycle helping distro folks get more regular drops from upstream. > > I think it's working extremely well. When it comes to security fixes, I want > them as soon as possible. There's no sense batching them. > > The only thing to be careful of is that -stable fixes (or complete reworks) > get merged with mainline, so the trees don't go out of sync. So far this > seems to have been OK. > As I recall these patches may or may not go into mainline. The next full release may address the problem in a whole new way. -- -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com) "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the last possible moment - but no longer" -me - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/