Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751290AbWEIQIS (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2006 12:08:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751284AbWEIQIS (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2006 12:08:18 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38299 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751286AbWEIQIH (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2006 12:08:07 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: virtualization@lists.osdl.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 15/35] subarch support for controlling interrupt delivery Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:07:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Christian Limpach , "Martin J. Bligh" , Chris Wright , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Pratt References: <20060509084945.373541000@sous-sol.org> <4460AC06.4000303@mbligh.org> <20060509155153.GJ7834@cl.cam.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20060509155153.GJ7834@cl.cam.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605091807.57522.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 459 Lines: 14 > > Anybody want to comment on the performance impact of making > local_irq_* non-inline functions? I would guess for that much inline code it will be even a win to not inline because it will save icache. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/