Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750767AbWEIQaK (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2006 12:30:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750710AbWEIQaJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2006 12:30:09 -0400 Received: from mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk ([128.232.0.15]:39072 "EHLO mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750763AbWEIQaH (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2006 12:30:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 17:29:59 +0100 From: Christian Limpach To: Andi Kleen Cc: virtualization@lists.osdl.org, "Martin J. Bligh" , Chris Wright , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Pratt Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 15/35] subarch support for controlling interrupt delivery Message-ID: <20060509162959.GL7834@cl.cam.ac.uk> References: <20060509084945.373541000@sous-sol.org> <4460AC06.4000303@mbligh.org> <20060509155153.GJ7834@cl.cam.ac.uk> <200605091807.57522.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605091807.57522.ak@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 617 Lines: 18 On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 06:07:57PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > Anybody want to comment on the performance impact of making > > local_irq_* non-inline functions? > > I would guess for that much inline code it will be even a win to not > inline because it will save icache. Maybe, although some of the macros compile down to only 2-3 instructions. christian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/