Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200721220035.32584-1-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> <20200721230426.GC2786714@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20200721230426.GC2786714@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
From:   Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:53:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMo8BfJeM0_MHcZWc4aZs0XVv9XH3vXwpiU0xjmU1G24fXV4tw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xtensa: fix access check in csum_and_copy_from_user
To:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     "open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT (xtensa)" 
        <linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 4:04 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 03:00:35PM -0700, Max Filippov wrote:
> > Commit d341659f470b ("xtensa: switch to providing
> > csum_and_copy_from_user()") introduced access check, but incorrectly
> > tested dst instead of src.
> > Fix access_ok argument in csum_and_copy_from_user.
>
> Applied, with apologies...  Which tree do you want it to go through?
> I'm dropping it into vfs.git#fixes, will send to Linus unless you
> prefer it to go some other way...

NP. Anything that will go into 5.8 is good.

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max