Received: by 2002:a25:e74b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e72csp283586ybh; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:02:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4grXzicPyw5PFI6AbsCOKZPVKspLSNvCRa3NY8E2U6mogep21x9XMjsRnFyC5pp9Ia2Uh X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:eb4b:: with SMTP id mc11mr28138095ejb.5.1595401341096; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:02:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1595401341; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0OkVnoL4+Yxpx23KE/kuBNr/T8o29JHnQ8P9nc08nmI0LsK8Cv8Ofiq4tUFrWy5Zln GbtKw9z1lt81s6V/rjKvfgrGsKWStBXFdDcobb9Zh/E4sii2P2Mi2B/DbYSw7heVEJGX jSMxIKJcUQAwxgVjh9+yH8XX22PvLFJZ23HaUgNA794ioVm055q9MRflq/gjY3TOvUVn Z3t6FjjLKaBU2w9C9EF0ln2abCDD7y/GVm9Jla+JEZcKTi3C46AIve5TJtfPK3G68Tsq kqdqKY4D+T5i2v5AZE2lX1eLWnnJq44S9WWbGd6KFN93AsXoBIcatJb7/3kbq88V2JV6 iTEg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=tY1klTi3CqvKo1vWFXFH3mWLnbUNs5pPCp00AUltpv4=; b=l+hYw6xKPWKwtoixfHnRHw5x2N6yn2jr6U5LRfO0GdtZdr2AP5CvzZGrg73v4wWCen s+r3Wz4wDQ7Lw53XiiP93LdNe07PqBWN7D46mNSuklerw/p7WTn4hbzmLHGSgKHzTKa7 9Ay7unCM+ReC7h+hM55f5pR8VQbwvRP+8qsYHgbEOuj6tQC9se3fZ6CCbVGhg40zmFtq 3V1/SMn6HdjhsftJf/odd5J6UVioO/QHNIhzCjD5RwGsR0vedU2PCmXpSzmV1HsPb1xj NSDYwKeGLQKQCudaDMAbaDQMZCax5xQ6EjX5CNf9dwrkeMZxFbCfn6FedG9skYwwirfA c3bg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a22si13641322ejj.163.2020.07.22.00.01.48; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729239AbgGVG72 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 02:59:28 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:47200 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728049AbgGVG71 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 02:59:27 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06M6XDbI012940; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 02:59:20 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32dn6yeaf4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 02:59:20 -0400 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 06M6Y94d015358; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 02:59:20 -0400 Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32dn6yeae9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 02:59:19 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06M6w79D012881; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 06:59:17 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 32brbgtch9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 06:59:17 +0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 06M6vnJM66126108 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 06:57:49 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105E0520B7; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 06:59:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.vnet.ibm.com (unknown [9.126.150.29]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FFF3520A3; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 06:59:07 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 12:29:07 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Gautham R Shenoy Cc: Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Valentin Schneider , Nick Piggin , Oliver OHalloran , Nathan Lynch , Michael Neuling , Anton Blanchard , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan , Jordan Niethe Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] powerpc/smp: Enable small core scheduling sooner Message-ID: <20200722065907.GC9290@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju References: <20200721113814.32284-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200721113814.32284-5-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200722055925.GC31038@in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200722055925.GC31038@in.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-22_02:2020-07-22,2020-07-22 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007220048 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Gautham R Shenoy [2020-07-22 11:29:25]: > Hello Srikar, > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 05:08:08PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > Enable small core scheduling as soon as we detect that we are in a > > system that supports thread group. Doing so would avoid a redundant > > check. > > The patch looks good to me. However, I think the commit message still > reflect the v1 code where we were moving the functionality from > smp_cpus_done() to init_big_cores(). > > In this we are moving it to a helper function to collate all fixups to > topology. > Right. Thanks for pointing , will correct this. -- Thanks and Regards Srikar Dronamraju