Received: by 2002:a25:e74b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e72csp490447ybh; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:56:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxTwAcusfVv8koPI/H8nIYE1E4T2noez+D4ra1n7TwcZgFqq6Mkv5bBcVrDOYgbEfSynBBD X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:364e:: with SMTP id r14mr897545ejb.258.1595422572369; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:56:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1595422572; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=t2BeXDdfM+5LeN+leM4Iy/hSQAftiocKOtdr7VOzWv43GGDsU4C5/SLub3pvQBP7Ft P/PVffI34szuCFCZTtbdddQXjocyqDtJF/zOICogC5k6NYb/NSMHzQwQk1wyy1eqgl/C 8OxK5ICBblc5VO0WwYg63Lt/qjoe6OYfVgGkLszgzWkQ5B7Jx0LEeJW3F+1WrvBRp4Hg 95wtooJ+1I3+xu9L1SpurPp7EYs6dhXLXwtDLgurWIuQlyDV8KroGgb+QIGHu6XQBGDR 8U3+6YanudktZEI3Wgt2cxWhIo2rhdcOf4DHfnIrhB5A1HlbEAvAI8GDHwSJjRHG+7mS jrMQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=SSETYCYmtHMi+voCUEEQ00lTWCSxEUNaRRcLZ5K0vz4=; b=A91R1JzyPW2InXUeGOplrFJ8KfBOXZvlN0L7V/2tR1r/LCvqZKqgf0GpDo4mDwBPmY VqXewbOqOanT6tp7QzB+0gWVv0ey5kESyAZzVAG99BufWL8rirIQWCPTqH6VHDvWnaxs eTIzJXbRaFSaNBl54lDw+JmSNaPB3xrYSdvPjzOvgijuO9MWkPs44ZkMEVWeUz5GE3vV xP3AtLnJ+L/lQRzNtbzeFTmSa/ECOAvBqRFdAn5RrY0GUUOPrZ2LjGm+MONPFD7HniX9 j5d0ATT6sKRVjo74gSVJpc3rvdNnRwgT+JOz7V3El060JKrlPU17SUjxULE3slLLxUNC dpZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dr11si12662508ejc.752.2020.07.22.05.55.49; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732352AbgGVMzh (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 08:55:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37002 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726525AbgGVMzg (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 08:55:36 -0400 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:4433::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83E3BC0619DC; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jyEHN-0094wv-03; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:55:25 +0200 Message-ID: <04d7301d5ad7555a0377c7df530ad8522fc00f77.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [RFC 2/7] ath10k: Add support to process rx packet in thread From: Johannes Berg To: Felix Fietkau , Rajkumar Manoharan , Rakesh Pillai Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dianders@chromium.org, evgreen@chromium.org Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:55:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1595351666-28193-1-git-send-email-pillair@codeaurora.org> <1595351666-28193-3-git-send-email-pillair@codeaurora.org> <13573549c277b34d4c87c471ff1a7060@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.3 (3.36.3-1.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 14:27 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: > I'm considering testing a different approach (with mt76 initially): > - Add a mac80211 rx function that puts processed skbs into a list > instead of handing them to the network stack directly. Would this be *after* all the mac80211 processing, i.e. in place of the rx-up-to-stack? johannes