Received: by 2002:a25:e74b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e72csp908153ybh; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 16:56:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwauT6vQqvz1J6IKDNEfkG44XcHuHktwazRxThl/kfbhQMNMArCZpH/FIMh4Kg2hCpJfzwV X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4b59:: with SMTP id j25mr1843589ejv.301.1595462199452; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 16:56:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1595462199; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cnkl9oSV1LJuAEOhEM8Af5tVYB1EYkt9QUe7yQTxu9x4a54qUqPKMqI3vGGI+bVyFC Y/2H/tu7WPJ63ABQhSndnEeVG8S0MHlrQtNRinYHYOO3FEEl8uo61a4xSuLQ1AUt5yoS LPLI8WFf5oHOPc6QUslUwgkyyLZGztFCFNcuu0WNz53961h913+owkXgCxIvyeD+YtRU ibcKJXewFrXDGjazle0G6x4vcnvqlBpSdR8/DoaRgsx7orDxEJhsXHi7Z1OU8Wwdlhds qqGq1GawlGJJ/gkGwCNMxkJrrACLT5SyiUaWt710pWyYkpJlCVYmzRItmoVMzG6/d0K0 rzfw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=m2Gd1D1Kjb/YffaHcNGXcDodTvrBFg4KPXr7w4wLz6g=; b=pXJZOZCRF+rlC0PTe5nW2gAMMyt/9P9UxYO+u7TqfYlABScDLAZzOQyql8f6rUhv+Z 8Wkfu/EY6rVBrrOD4ypkF+Lu1P5vufdCnufTXu+ChGlrknmK8CpVcHEm59oN2G8HPPcO KG26bf9mRivDpgx3KyllEo1P/52FXBhey5b5PWCcdzmovgAIjY9PDWwI0U3PeH1r1lko bX9FeLTBixQdTZVUK9ssSEbEwrxwn115BTdfP79Fy0VUsbbfIfO6PXNmliQIubgx37dL 64pwXatebAN0LeO7CqH8xh6LlF/Kb7cjaxdPAziXnAPFUzSPTOw/7/kW5tPG+pCVAgbQ p1yg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=V19oSDG3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 92si918280edj.9.2020.07.22.16.56.17; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 16:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=V19oSDG3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733213AbgGVX4I (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:56:08 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:43878 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733148AbgGVX4G (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:56:06 -0400 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06MNu282130860; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:56:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1595462162; bh=m2Gd1D1Kjb/YffaHcNGXcDodTvrBFg4KPXr7w4wLz6g=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=V19oSDG3bM1YRR2bSik02AV/tKsqrJ+6sEPGlZYZ2yPhEUq86T5tK3AG+WzUEBEkg zMTXxzrPhYFd5FhtyO+iKUDUDFAZc3dAwQ1d5mP39wCMqheuBxlDLquqXKPOX67d2O N2YoRuQaFgn86x8N7LCILV79J/tRyau4/VE5io2o= Received: from DFLE106.ent.ti.com (dfle106.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.27]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06MNu27V105634 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:56:02 -0500 Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) by DFLE106.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:56:01 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:56:01 -0500 Received: from lelv0597.itg.ti.com (lelv0597.itg.ti.com [10.181.64.32]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06MNu1ZD022072; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:56:01 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.34.248]) by lelv0597.itg.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 06MNu1ON072356; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:56:01 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring CC: Lokesh Vutla , , , , , Suman Anna Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] remoteproc: k3-r5: Add loading support for on-chip SRAM regions Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:55:54 -0500 Message-ID: <20200722235554.7511-5-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200722235554.7511-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200722235554.7511-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The K3 SoCs has various internal on-chip SRAM memories like the SRAM within the MCU domain or the shared MSMC RAM within NavSS that can be used for multiple purposes. One such purpose is to have the R5F cores use a portion of such on-chip SRAM for fast-access data or to directly execute code. Add support to the K3 R5 remoteproc driver to parse and support loading into such memories. The SRAM regions need to be mapped as normal non-cacheable memory to avoid kernel crashes when the remoteproc loader code uses the Arm64 memset library function (the "DC ZVA" instruction throws a alignment fault on device type memory). These SRAM regions are completely optional as not all firmware images require these memories, and any such memory has to be reserved as such in the DTS files. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v3: No code changes, picked up review tags v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11632991/ v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456373/ drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c index 3a27fe881e30..fc473a90edef 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c @@ -85,7 +85,9 @@ struct k3_r5_cluster { * @dev: cached device pointer * @rproc: rproc handle representing this core * @mem: internal memory regions data + * @sram: on-chip SRAM memory regions data * @num_mems: number of internal memory regions + * @num_sram: number of on-chip SRAM memory regions * @reset: reset control handle * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle @@ -99,7 +101,9 @@ struct k3_r5_core { struct device *dev; struct rproc *rproc; struct k3_r5_mem *mem; + struct k3_r5_mem *sram; int num_mems; + int num_sram; struct reset_control *reset; struct ti_sci_proc *tsp; const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci; @@ -587,6 +591,18 @@ static void *k3_r5_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len) } } + /* handle any SRAM regions using SoC-view addresses */ + for (i = 0; i < core->num_sram; i++) { + dev_addr = core->sram[i].dev_addr; + size = core->sram[i].size; + + if (da >= dev_addr && ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) { + offset = da - dev_addr; + va = core->sram[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + } + /* handle static DDR reserved memory regions */ for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) { dev_addr = kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr; @@ -1027,6 +1043,63 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_get_internal_memories(struct platform_device *pdev, return 0; } +static int k3_r5_core_of_get_sram_memories(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct k3_r5_core *core) +{ + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct device_node *sram_np; + struct resource res; + int num_sram; + int i, ret; + + num_sram = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "sram", sizeof(phandle)); + if (num_sram <= 0) { + dev_dbg(dev, "device does not use reserved on-chip memories, num_sram = %d\n", + num_sram); + return 0; + } + + core->sram = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_sram, sizeof(*core->sram), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!core->sram) + return -ENOMEM; + + for (i = 0; i < num_sram; i++) { + sram_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "sram", i); + if (!sram_np) + return -EINVAL; + + if (!of_device_is_available(sram_np)) { + of_node_put(sram_np); + return -EINVAL; + } + + ret = of_address_to_resource(sram_np, 0, &res); + of_node_put(sram_np); + if (ret) + return -EINVAL; + + core->sram[i].bus_addr = res.start; + core->sram[i].dev_addr = res.start; + core->sram[i].size = resource_size(&res); + core->sram[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, res.start, + resource_size(&res)); + if (!core->sram[i].cpu_addr) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to parse and map sram%d memory at %pad\n", + i, &res.start); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + dev_dbg(dev, "memory sram%d: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n", + i, &core->sram[i].bus_addr, + core->sram[i].size, core->sram[i].cpu_addr, + core->sram[i].dev_addr); + } + core->num_sram = num_sram; + + return 0; +} + static struct ti_sci_proc *k3_r5_core_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev, const struct ti_sci_handle *sci) @@ -1142,6 +1215,12 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err; } + ret = k3_r5_core_of_get_sram_memories(pdev, core); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get sram memories, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto err; + } + ret = ti_sci_proc_request(core->tsp); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(dev, "ti_sci_proc_request failed, ret = %d\n", ret); -- 2.26.0