Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S279832AbRJ0OWt>; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 10:22:49 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S279833AbRJ0OWj>; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 10:22:39 -0400
Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:58711 "EHLO
	flinx.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S279832AbRJ0OWY>; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 10:22:24 -0400
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Igor Mozetic <igor.mozetic@uni-mb.si>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Any stable 2.4 kernel?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0110270755550.32445-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
From: ebiederman@uswest.net (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: 27 Oct 2001 08:12:09 -0600
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0110270755550.32445-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
Message-ID: <m1g085mati.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>
Lines: 22
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> writes:

> On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Igor Mozetic wrote:
> 
> > I wonder if anybody has found a stable kernel for the following
> > hardware: C440GX+,
> 
> > Any recommendation for 2.4
> 
> My recommendation would be to ask Intel to release the
> documentation for the 440GX so the people writing the
> Linux kernel have a chance of working around the bugs.

???  The 440GX is documented.  What documentation is missing?

> 
> Alternatively, get hardware for which documentation is
> available.

???

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/