Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 23 Jul 2020 17:13:10 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Cc:     Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [char-misc-next 1/6] mei: hbm: use sizeof of variable instead of
 struct type
Message-ID: <20200723151310.GA2809544@kroah.com>
References: <20200723145927.882743-1-tomas.winkler@intel.com>
 <20200723145927.882743-2-tomas.winkler@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200723145927.882743-2-tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 05:59:22PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> There is a possibility of bug when variable type has changed but
> corresponding struct passed to the sizeof has not.
> 
> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

This doesn't apply to my tree as I've applied Gustavo's patch.  Should I
revert that first?

thanks,

greg k-h