Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 11:34:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 11:34:08 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:25092 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 11:33:56 -0400 Subject: Re: Any stable 2.4 kernel? To: riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 16:40:40 +0100 (BST) Cc: igor.mozetic@uni-mb.si (Igor Mozetic), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Rik van Riel" at Oct 27, 2001 07:56:57 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > My recommendation would be to ask Intel to release the > documentation for the 440GX so the people writing the > Linux kernel have a chance of working around the bugs. > > Alternatively, get hardware for which documentation is > available. The 440GX problems we've seen have been incorrect IRQ routing and related problems that generally screw you right from boot up. In that sense the 440GX boards are sometimes "winputers" rather than PC compatibles. It doesn't fit the random crash report - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/