Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
        bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, luto@kernel.org,
        mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-next@vger.kernel.org, lpf.vector@gmail.com,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:LINE! (2)
In-Reply-To: <20200724142801.49d5e7a3@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <000000000000588c2c05aa156b2b@google.com> <0000000000003cdc6c05aae24652@google.com> <20200720200618.GA9501@pc636> <20200722142759.GB4041@lca.pw> <20200722144650.GA19628@pc636> <20200723195029.60933e30f5d3dd64d6a861b3@linux-foundation.org> <20200724142801.49d5e7a3@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:47:07 +0200
Message-ID: <87a6zpuzgk.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
>> All a bit mysterious.  I think it's best that we revert this from
>> linux-next until we hear from Ingo.  I queued a patch - I expect
>> Stephen will see and grab it, thanks.
>
> In the end I actually did the revert (of the revert) in the merge of
> the tip tree (so that -next will bisect better if necessary).  So you
> will not need the revert in your quilt series after today.

Sigh. I have no idea why this was in tip auto-latest. I just
reintegrated that branch and the annoyance should be gone now.

Sorry for not paying attention.

Thanks,

        tglx