Received: by 2002:a25:e74b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e72csp2008159ybh;
        Fri, 24 Jul 2020 02:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZbuRN9y7MgdND3yNX7pYzhWoI1YjKWS39+uKh3KuHdZtFUIkqmOGx6mWa/hWeAR/BcIhn
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:12d7:: with SMTP id k23mr576558edx.312.1595581247269;
        Fri, 24 Jul 2020 02:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1595581247; cv=none;
        d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        b=S5CPdkM2FRXdiveZAVhrWP0UOLnP2hMBMHJOig2IdrrtCAtDvAclUtMR/NYTi9eR6E
         Cnd1K77CQ2hnYocrHQb46i5nhW9C5G7wVNunXZaluRpQa7E1UvBpTKo9tkpBoRvh6hgQ
         rymmFEkjHOqmBL3z8OZ7GbJGGV/Cox34A3FuyeG4zl3Zy9fjwMsijOJbGZneuRSWA54F
         f0KSCcnlQz8SvhifaY73viXTt0jzvQd7rYe9gd7nGJI+RVGBexA7UT3lbapD1waQL6UN
         0FJP2NRD4n55E88YK4/T1Nkm9mGFmKYnN+QHIGEq35N2/4SC1UVWqqHq7mD5Z7eqyAhX
         vY5g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:message-id:date:to:cc:from
         :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding
         :mime-version:dkim-signature;
        bh=YsHTnsQITOYhjYePtzDhkv+cyLxkEuGGUYjPnpH6//c=;
        b=dtc2fe46OuquEiFzIzVb0JX1N6V147S7aa1vin3CvlAy06bZv7w/BGNogbBfDgJcAs
         mpWSX5EzIX8rhXPuIlW4l2VdQw0hoCi55s27cwXOb56FfrFoS/j2filsD75VmmEOueOC
         azUnUQiBB0mDIqY8zh3p7d8qZ4XIeLsqA9nliVabY1vbKltCeCxszfPd/0sLFYesIoza
         DZBVdYYXh8K4mB2aT/a5TIZyhyl/YPXlvZkl8udN+f6cNmqUjjVHdC9wdmpUHI/rLIBf
         TAyIKOpVntPAQ0YJ4G3cGgfBobzvV4E6kcdAypCynbhZhftVOaf3qdOL4ywVS1DR045Z
         IIoA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=PjBp02Fe;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h21si203662ejb.246.2020.07.24.02.00.23;
        Fri, 24 Jul 2020 02:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=PjBp02Fe;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727097AbgGXI5v (ORCPT <rfc822;peterpeng024@gmail.com>
        + 99 others); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 04:57:51 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40088 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726554AbgGXI5u (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 24 Jul 2020 04:57:50 -0400
Received: from kernel.org (unknown [104.132.0.74])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A11E2070B;
        Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:57:50 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
        s=default; t=1595581070;
        bh=YsHTnsQITOYhjYePtzDhkv+cyLxkEuGGUYjPnpH6//c=;
        h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From;
        b=PjBp02Fel9w9oeFcXZVzD1NeK0WgeSOzF73GDkSS1tOSfFPSi8gAVwc6P2Ra1DftJ
         Cb4FTjonIniOzi9rvYhKy0DVAbKFp1ct/lvNLX7QFMF6dXUVjFS83Y6SQwPx99VZZE
         wAXyBbs3aIMbWlnQzDOD08xgISSNunRh9/W/OTb4=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <7ef7009b4e9f986fd6dfbf487c0e85de68a4ba9b.1594880946.git.rahul.tanwar@linux.intel.com>
References: <7ef7009b4e9f986fd6dfbf487c0e85de68a4ba9b.1594880946.git.rahul.tanwar@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] clk: intel: Use devm_clk_hw_register() instead of clk_hw_register()
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@intel.com,
        qi-ming.wu@intel.com, yixin.zhu@linux.intel.com,
        cheol.yong.kim@intel.com, rahul.tanwar.linux@gmail.com,
        Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@linux.intel.com>
To:     Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:57:49 -0700
Message-ID: <159558106988.3847286.6240833838779403056@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
User-Agent: alot/0.9.1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Quoting Rahul Tanwar (2020-07-15 23:30:30)
> To ensure that clks are unregistered in case of any failure, use
> devm_clk_hw_register() instead of clk_hw_register().
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@linux.intel.com>
> ---

Applied to clk-next