Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Will Deacon <willdeacon@google.com>
Cc:     npiggin@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
        jniethe5@gmail.com, msuchanek@suse.de, paulus@samba.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>,
        kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20200716193820.1141936-1-palmer@dabbelt.com>
References: <20200716193820.1141936-1-palmer@dabbelt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/64: Fix an out of date comment about MMIO ordering
Message-Id: <159559697172.1657499.14368228495374762010.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 23:25:12 +1000 (AEST)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 12:38:20 -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> This primitive has been renamed, but because it was spelled incorrectly in the
> first place it must have escaped the fixup patch.  As far as I can tell this
> logic is still correct: smp_mb__after_spinlock() uses the default smp_mb()
> implementation, which is "sync" rather than "hwsync" but those are the same
> (though I'm not that familiar with PowerPC).

Applied to powerpc/next.

[1/1] powerpc/64: Fix an out of date comment about MMIO ordering
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/147c13413c04bc6a2bd76f2503402905e5e98cff

cheers