Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 21:39:13 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To:     Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, ludovic.desroches@microchip.com,
        nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
        kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-binding: i2c: add generic properties for GPIO
 bus recovery
Message-ID: <20200724193913.GD1227@ninjato>
References: <20200619141904.910889-1-codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>
 <20200619141904.910889-2-codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>
 <20200705211918.GB1055@kunai>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200705211918.GB1055@kunai>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 11:19:18PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>=20
> > +- pinctrl
> > +	add extra pinctrl to configure SCL/SDA pins to GPIO function for bus
> > +	recovery, call it "gpio" or "recovery" state
>=20
> I think we should stick with "gpio" only. That is what at91 and imx have
> in their bindings. pxa uses "recovery" as a pinctrl state name but I
> can't find any further use or documentation of that. PXA is not fully
> converted to the best of my knowledge, so maybe it is no problem for PXA
> to switch to "gpio", too? We should ask Russell King (cced).
>=20
> Russell, do you object naming the pinctrl state for bus recovery in
> the pxa i2c driver from "recovery" to "gpio"?

No response, so far. I suggest now to support the "recovery" naming but
mark it as deprecated. Opinions?


--C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ZcrW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN--