Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     jun qian <qianjun.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, peterz@infradead.org,
        will@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>, lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [Softirq] a76eadba0d: WARNING:at_net/mac80211/rx.c:#ieee80211_rx_napi[mac80211]
In-Reply-To: <CAKc596Lp3m3Ny9joOckYPsR5Lmok978bceMYNBrzsk6ozFjqhw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200723091715.GL19262@shao2-debian> <87v9iexztl.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <CAKc596KA2moT7fgO+Ount5trEbtrYsuLbde5S5Ou-c4EQbHb3g@mail.gmail.com> <874kpyxpro.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <CAKc596Lp3m3Ny9joOckYPsR5Lmok978bceMYNBrzsk6ozFjqhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Jul 2020 01:31:37 +0200
Message-ID: <87y2n8sd5y.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

jun qian <qianjun.kernel@gmail.com> writes:
> I have two questions that need to be discussed.
>
> 1. If the __do_sofrirq() is executed in the ksoftirqd, we may not need
> to check the timeout in the loop.
> 2. Both the invoke_softirq() and run_ksoftirqd()  will execute
> __do_sofirq, they all execute the same code=EF=BC=8C
>     when it is in the ksoftirqd, Do we need to wake up ksoftirqd in
> the process context according to
>     max_restart and MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME. In my opinion, If we  use a flag
> to distinguish where
>     __do_softirq() is called from,  we can do what is most suitable
> for __do_softirq based on this flag.

You answered your questions yourself :)