Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200724213659.273599-1-martin.botka1@gmail.com> <20200724213659.273599-3-martin.botka1@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200724213659.273599-3-martin.botka1@gmail.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 26 Jul 2020 12:04:18 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdJ14p+_+XqxrgRrjXF7m6L4nGr5vB03NTM=0xjgw4c7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period
 with u64 data length
To:     Martin Botka <martin.botka1@gmail.com>
Cc:     Fenglin Wu <fenglinw@codeaurora.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=C3=B6nig?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 12:40 AM Martin Botka <martin.botka1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Fenglin Wu <fenglinw@codeaurora.org>
>
> Currently, PWM core driver provides interfaces for configuring PWM
> period and duty length in nanoseconds with an integer data type, so
> the max period can be only set to ~2.147 seconds. Add interfaces which
> can set PWM period and duty with u64 data type to remove this
> limitation.

And all divisions go mad on 32-bit CPU, right?
Please, if you thought about it carefully, update a commit message to
clarify that.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko