Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 09F83C433C9
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
        Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
        Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>,
        Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] iwlwifi: yoyo: don't print failure if debug firmware is missing
References: <20200625165210.14904-1-wsa@kernel.org>
        <20200726152642.GA913@ninjato>
Date:   Sun, 26 Jul 2020 21:11:25 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20200726152642.GA913@ninjato> (Wolfram Sang's message of "Sun,
        26 Jul 2020 17:26:42 +0200")
Message-ID: <87y2n6404y.fsf@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:52:10PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Missing this firmware is not fatal, my wifi card still works. Even more,
>> I couldn't find any documentation what it is or where to get it. So, I
>> don't think the users should be notified if it is missing. If you browse
>> the net, you see the message is present is in quite some logs. Better
>> remove it.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
>> ---
>
> Any input on this? Or people I should add to CC?

This was discussed on another thread:

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87mu3magfp.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net

Unless Intel folks object I'm planning to take this to
wireless-drivers-next.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches