Received: by 2002:a25:ca44:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a65csp597226ybg; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:01:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzp/Y3lSp/kErp9yszrLArO4sJK3Ly3W4d2gr4U6YhWm1GWLzi2Bm6xbluW0LSIVwy7TgiM X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2212:: with SMTP id cq18mr19297843edb.173.1595800899964; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:01:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1595800899; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KN6/tyBod8ipgGlZIt9MXUWOPmfDwv9Zz5UgfiP+sWjjv6PYSwlYUGkFe3XFfIxsKK YP0V11FDg+vEeEt6VBS3VoNRKyt4FyQoF+EALsPngVA0mEtPMGAmXvBbAkHMnrBs/yzJ oI3PihZMxjQuklppBA1KNLPPSYydtoINVhNOYxMGgHAiav4/iA8M2mSNhqtJeAk5fSKF 7hkx48C6gPF87Ikydc4F8fJkoI0KewaJnTpUpNxOX1Lpo3cyZ1eBqghv1fYUlDQBGhr8 SX8PNqCsdgiK9v8bPAyzWX6u25Mla9SjFOrBmlamjOKDe/aQBZ4bdLdTL0AaBEIP/yZl 6Uew== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=7ykSwHy3a+Ip4FoHWFbddbOpkLlMmZDO0+DHppvg2II=; b=TK5sBzj/9kuMNn+4tyyfiFTCixd30NqwEB0155TWS+7hL61qhr+W3XZ/a9VMlGh5aC nd31QxsiY1Xu8tGM9ZIwT5kFmt2uOOXpDdZM+QEwCb+dk/qhO7br78UM8ogFsqwNUcgp p8qCn0Y0XB7ZnHR+HE5F8gmLyaBESOMD3tnU1VtmA9+j62VBLeEGaPTOBUJyFRDw/sDO xJue7U5hVr6Pi8GTRV/RW+shwk5hdHiAcPUhn25226D0CdxrFdgYteHmWCCQ0k1Mt/V8 T1VRbaGlXW3++g36Wboe8Ov4Svr5uNthIBet3TRXjDkbS00DB8B294MDhgTpkAEYjO2/ KwNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="Mw0p/PEf"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z10si5036227ejc.59.2020.07.26.15.01.17; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="Mw0p/PEf"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726947AbgGZWBJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 26 Jul 2020 18:01:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54932 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726253AbgGZWBI (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jul 2020 18:01:08 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AE97C0619D2 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:01:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id z18so9402920wrm.12 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:01:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7ykSwHy3a+Ip4FoHWFbddbOpkLlMmZDO0+DHppvg2II=; b=Mw0p/PEfaeYglOPiT3m4tEPCjMBi+cCMcsbcapS8TPn/lxiUqyIg6mPPAmgmsbj2wc LBGBOIgCiWC/LAHNuJBGs+hq3NlNh8ACxcd+YB66SzwQIgUusgooK/+oy7rQf3cYcHyy x56tSa+U6PEHUKAZizQgepS25TaKfnGgi6pGsA0DcrV4wV5xGfyzgI+ocW60NaAwsilY BEvNWPnqKLnVWUdSjstJkFM0eDyx2abEHyKF107jIU2f5fYR6ITyoaUXSaD/os3LPU82 cWM0RPKlFHlHzlgHjQkYpOty4vPSSHMffSAaJnE6N4jUFQnh4mvd5WY2WPt+aYkc9H1U XLdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7ykSwHy3a+Ip4FoHWFbddbOpkLlMmZDO0+DHppvg2II=; b=Q+z3RJfgEM9NjJ+qhR6kcaPdcbIPnir/I0B4vldg0SzQqwdIB8CRXIViCdCYSETg+O enOXWuuH1Yj358sS3Momheda1eHcY+DD9AZmUVJkUv7dKPK1zlWfwmowG3TZr61aGKxU Vrvv9M89+Kc65hISRZrxjpG5V2SmaLTk3XTYZaGmAzqvH0l8BvNNJ6/77xYPXhbB+/UY pGa+hPotzv0v5Oe6TW17/oqwU7WD9oe2qGjLqoMeZu29q9tju5Ow2DMfQM0l/R/XU3b7 Gm+SG4LdDYDoYnv1EuoAz3AZYlmz3C+PDXwGDs0g6vH3BHoGvnh4pjg1RZ2mbzUqbIjl Z4Tw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533wXuW7R+Kw/vmyoiXUOOS56c+GFzJHS8WgbGwayZHN/Ld/rJDN 1X8BXwrrdFQMbAardR5Qh/umgRNiqlPTTyvq2r7hwA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f48b:: with SMTP id l11mr5754937wro.376.1595800866341; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:01:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200726075244.1191481-1-jolsa@kernel.org> <20200726075244.1191481-2-jolsa@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20200726075244.1191481-2-jolsa@kernel.org> From: Ian Rogers Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:00:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] perf tools: Fix term parsing for raw syntax To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jin Yao , lkml , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Alexander Shishkin , Peter Zijlstra , Michael Petlan , Stephane Eranian , Andi Kleen , Thomas Richter Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 12:53 AM Jiri Olsa wrote: > > Jin Yao reported issue with possible conflict between raw > events and term values in pmu event syntax. > > Currently following syntax is resolved as raw event with > 0xead value: > uncore_imc_free_running/read/ > > instead of using 'read' term from uncore_imc_free_running pmu, > because 'read' is correct raw event syntax with 0xead value. > > To solve this issue we do following: > - check existing terms during rXXXX syntax processing > and make them priority in case of conflict > - allow pmu/r0x1234/ syntax to be able to specify conflicting > raw event (implemented in previous patch) > > Also adding automated tests for this and perf_pmu__parse_cleanup > call to parse_events_terms, so the test gets properly cleaned up. > > Reported-by: Jin Yao > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa > --- > v2 changes: > - added comment to perf_pmu__test_parse_init Acked-by: Ian Rogers Thanks, Ian > tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tools/perf/util/parse-events.h | 2 ++ > tools/perf/util/parse-events.l | 19 ++++++++++------- > 4 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c > index 5aaddcb0058a..7f9f87a470c3 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c > @@ -631,6 +631,34 @@ static int test__checkterms_simple(struct list_head *terms) > TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong val", term->val.num == 1); > TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong config", !strcmp(term->config, "umask")); > > + /* > + * read > + * > + * The perf_pmu__test_parse_init injects 'read' term into > + * perf_pmu_events_list, so 'read' is evaluated as read term > + * and not as raw event with 'ead' hex value. > + */ > + term = list_entry(term->list.next, struct parse_events_term, list); > + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong type term", > + term->type_term == PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_USER); > + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong type val", > + term->type_val == PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_NUM); > + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong val", term->val.num == 1); > + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong config", !strcmp(term->config, "read")); > + > + /* > + * r0xead > + * > + * To be still able to pass 'ead' value with 'r' syntax, > + * we added support to parse 'r0xHEX' event. > + */ > + term = list_entry(term->list.next, struct parse_events_term, list); > + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong type term", > + term->type_term == PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_CONFIG); > + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong type val", > + term->type_val == PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_NUM); > + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong val", term->val.num == 0xead); > + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong config", !term->config); > return 0; > } > > @@ -1781,7 +1809,7 @@ struct terms_test { > > static struct terms_test test__terms[] = { > [0] = { > - .str = "config=10,config1,config2=3,umask=1", > + .str = "config=10,config1,config2=3,umask=1,read,r0xead", > .check = test__checkterms_simple, > }, > }; > @@ -1841,6 +1869,13 @@ static int test_term(struct terms_test *t) > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&terms); > > + /* > + * The perf_pmu__test_parse_init prepares perf_pmu_events_list > + * which gets freed in parse_events_terms. > + */ > + if (perf_pmu__test_parse_init()) > + return -1; > + > ret = parse_events_terms(&terms, t->str); > if (ret) { > pr_debug("failed to parse terms '%s', err %d\n", > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c > index e88e4c7a2a9a..9f7260e69113 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c > @@ -2019,6 +2019,32 @@ static void perf_pmu__parse_init(void) > perf_pmu__parse_cleanup(); > } > > +/* > + * This function injects special term in > + * perf_pmu_events_list so the test code > + * can check on this functionality. > + */ > +int perf_pmu__test_parse_init(void) > +{ > + struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *list; > + > + list = malloc(sizeof(*list) * 1); > + if (!list) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + list->type = PMU_EVENT_SYMBOL; > + list->symbol = strdup("read"); > + > + if (!list->symbol) { > + free(list); > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + > + perf_pmu_events_list = list; > + perf_pmu_events_list_num = 1; > + return 0; > +} > + > enum perf_pmu_event_symbol_type > perf_pmu__parse_check(const char *name) > { > @@ -2080,6 +2106,8 @@ int parse_events_terms(struct list_head *terms, const char *str) > int ret; > > ret = parse_events__scanner(str, &parse_state); > + perf_pmu__parse_cleanup(); > + > if (!ret) { > list_splice(parse_state.terms, terms); > zfree(&parse_state.terms); > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h > index f0010095fc8c..00cde7d2e30c 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h > +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h > @@ -261,4 +261,6 @@ static inline bool is_sdt_event(char *str __maybe_unused) > } > #endif /* HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT */ > > +int perf_pmu__test_parse_init(void); > + > #endif /* __PERF_PARSE_EVENTS_H */ > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l > index 44c85fea5d00..3ca5fd2829ca 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l > +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l > @@ -41,14 +41,6 @@ static int value(yyscan_t scanner, int base) > return __value(yylval, text, base, PE_VALUE); > } > > -static int raw(yyscan_t scanner) > -{ > - YYSTYPE *yylval = parse_events_get_lval(scanner); > - char *text = parse_events_get_text(scanner); > - > - return __value(yylval, text + 1, 16, PE_RAW); > -} > - > static int str(yyscan_t scanner, int token) > { > YYSTYPE *yylval = parse_events_get_lval(scanner); > @@ -72,6 +64,17 @@ static int str(yyscan_t scanner, int token) > return token; > } > > +static int raw(yyscan_t scanner) > +{ > + YYSTYPE *yylval = parse_events_get_lval(scanner); > + char *text = parse_events_get_text(scanner); > + > + if (perf_pmu__parse_check(text) == PMU_EVENT_SYMBOL) > + return str(scanner, PE_NAME); > + > + return __value(yylval, text + 1, 16, PE_RAW); > +} > + > static bool isbpf_suffix(char *text) > { > int len = strlen(text); > -- > 2.25.4 >