Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 08:48:28 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/23] init: open code setting up stdin/stdout/stderr
Message-ID: <20200727064828.GA2317@lst.de>
References: <20200714190427.4332-1-hch@lst.de> <20200714190427.4332-19-hch@lst.de> <20200727030534.GD795125@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200727054625.GA1241@lst.de> <20200727060322.GC794331@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200727060322.GC794331@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 07:03:22AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 07:46:25AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 04:05:34AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 09:04:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > Don't rely on the implicit set_fs(KERNEL_DS) for ksys_open to work, but
> > > > instead open a struct file for /dev/console and then install it as FD
> > > > 0/1/2 manually.
> > > 
> > > I really hate that one.  Every time we exposed the internal details to
> > > the fucking early init code, we paid for that afterwards.  And this
> > > goes over the top wrt the level of details being exposed.
> > > 
> > > _IF_ you want to keep that thing, move it to fs/file.c, with dire comment
> > > re that being very special shite for init and likely cause of subsequent
> > > trouble whenever anything gets changed, a gnat farts somewhere, etc.
> > 
> > Err, while I'm all for keeping internals internal, fd_install and
> > get_unused_fd_flags are exported routines with tons of users of this
> > pattern all over.
> 
> get_file_rcu_many()?  All over the place?  Besides, that's _not_ the normal
> pattern for get_unused_fd() - there's a very special reason we don't expect
> an error from it here.

Oh well.  I can add an init_dup2, but that should probably go after
the series adding fs/for-init.c or fs/init.c.  I'll skip it for the
current set of fixups and will send it once we have a stable branch for
that.