Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 04:31:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 04:31:24 -0500 Received: from saw.sw.com.sg ([203.120.9.98]:37504 "HELO saw.sw.com.sg") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 04:31:08 -0500 Message-ID: <20001113173105.A7086@saw.sw.com.sg> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 17:31:05 +0800 From: Andrey Savochkin To: "Allen, David B" , michael@pmcl.ph.utexas.edu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: intel etherpro100 on 2.2.18p21 vs 2.2.18p17 In-Reply-To: <93BA6BFC5E48D4118A8200508B6BBC4924AB7A@sf1-mail01.hamquist.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <93BA6BFC5E48D4118A8200508B6BBC4924AB7A@sf1-mail01.hamquist.com>; from "Allen, David B" on Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 04:24:12PM Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 04:24:12PM -0800, Allen, David B wrote: > FWIW, I have a dual-proc SuperMicro motherboard P3DM3 with integrated > Adaptec SCSI and Intel 8255x built-in NIC. > > Sometimes on a cold boot I get the "kernel: eth0: card reports no RX > buffers" that repeats, but if I follow it with a warm boot the message > doesn't appear (even on subsequent warm boots). So this is definitely > reproducible, but it doesn't happen every time. Yes, it's a problem, and it indeed happens not every time. Dragan Stancevic has promised to check it against Intel's errata. Best regards Andrey V. Savochkin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/