Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030217AbWEKLHr (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 May 2006 07:07:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030223AbWEKLHq (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 May 2006 07:07:46 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.233]:28050 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030217AbWEKLHq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 May 2006 07:07:46 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=cqpuQ5lQpYZWkToPIIgosWm+12I93zR60GW0vgisckF5nq4T/n8p8a5mhRDyJ+PhsrTkd1n9EkD1D+GYuXebLZjxrC2158LL2rq0v7tN+IRGGyMKU7y+fIEHrtWHaEkPbyh4wyPRUDDRTqzdiqupflVQJgEctxQmgcMj2eaibsY= Message-ID: <7c3341450605110407g70159436ye1a60283ed586c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:07:45 +0100 From: "Nick Warne" To: "Maciej Soltysiak" Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16.16 Cc: "Chris Wright" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <296295514.20060511123419@dns.toxicfilms.tv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060511022547.GE25010@moss.sous-sol.org> <296295514.20060511123419@dns.toxicfilms.tv> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 98d197ca087806c5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1067 Lines: 30 On 11/05/06, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > But this one looks important, something that every kernel build > has in its code path, however I am unable to say if I need it badly > or maybe not. > > The url: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-1860 > says nothing about it. > > Could we have a word or two under each patchlet that would qualify them > somehow? > Like: > "Important, not required for all, apply if using SCTP" > "Important, required for all, may *do bad things*, apply ASAP" > "Critical, required for all, surely will *do bad things*, apply ASAP" This is exactly my thoughts. I read the changelog: http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.16.16 and it does look important, but I am not sure either if I need to apply. Good suggestion, Maciej! Nick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/