Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 15:50:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 15:50:32 -0400 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:4041 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 15:50:26 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 15:50:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cc: Linus Torvalds , Richard Gooch Subject: Re: more devfs fun (Piled Higher and Deeper) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org devfs_rmdir() checks that directory is empty. Then it calls devfsd_notify_one(), which can block. Then it marks the entry unregistered and reports success. Guess what will happen if devfs_register() will happen at that moment... /me _seriously_ considers hostile takeover of the damn thing I mean, when holes are found at that rate just by cursory look through the code... And that stuff had been there for at least 2 years. Richard, I hate to break it on you, but dealing with that crap is generally considered a maintainer's job. And it is supposed to happen slightly faster - 2 years would be bad even for MS. If you don't have time for that work - say so and step down, nobody will blame you for that. Repeating that everything will be fine RSN is getting real old by now... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/