Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Smtp-Origin-Hostprefix: devvm
From:   Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Smtp-Origin-Hostname: devvm1096.prn0.facebook.com
To:     <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Smtp-Origin-Cluster: prn0c01
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 22/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 11:44:53 -0700
Message-ID: <20200727184506.2279656-23-guro@fb.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200727184506.2279656-1-guro@fb.com>
References: <20200727184506.2279656-1-guro@fb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

bpf_ringbuf_alloc() can't return anything except ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM)
and a valid pointer, so to simplify the code make it return NULL
in the first case. This allows to drop a couple of lines in
ringbuf_map_alloc() and also makes it look similar to other memory
allocating function like kmalloc().

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c | 24 ++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c b/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c
index e8e2c39cbdc9..e687b798d097 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ struct bpf_ringbuf {
=20
 struct bpf_ringbuf_map {
 	struct bpf_map map;
-	struct bpf_map_memory memory;
 	struct bpf_ringbuf *rb;
 };
=20
@@ -135,7 +134,7 @@ static struct bpf_ringbuf *bpf_ringbuf_alloc(size_t d=
ata_sz, int numa_node)
=20
 	rb =3D bpf_ringbuf_area_alloc(data_sz, numa_node);
 	if (!rb)
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+		return NULL;
=20
 	spin_lock_init(&rb->spinlock);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&rb->waitq);
@@ -151,8 +150,6 @@ static struct bpf_ringbuf *bpf_ringbuf_alloc(size_t d=
ata_sz, int numa_node)
 static struct bpf_map *ringbuf_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	struct bpf_ringbuf_map *rb_map;
-	u64 cost;
-	int err;
=20
 	if (attr->map_flags & ~RINGBUF_CREATE_FLAG_MASK)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
@@ -174,26 +171,13 @@ static struct bpf_map *ringbuf_map_alloc(union bpf_=
attr *attr)
=20
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&rb_map->map, attr);
=20
-	cost =3D sizeof(struct bpf_ringbuf_map) +
-	       sizeof(struct bpf_ringbuf) +
-	       attr->max_entries;
-	err =3D bpf_map_charge_init(&rb_map->map.memory, cost);
-	if (err)
-		goto err_free_map;
-
 	rb_map->rb =3D bpf_ringbuf_alloc(attr->max_entries, rb_map->map.numa_no=
de);
-	if (IS_ERR(rb_map->rb)) {
-		err =3D PTR_ERR(rb_map->rb);
-		goto err_uncharge;
+	if (!rb_map->rb) {
+		kfree(rb_map);
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
=20
 	return &rb_map->map;
-
-err_uncharge:
-	bpf_map_charge_finish(&rb_map->map.memory);
-err_free_map:
-	kfree(rb_map);
-	return ERR_PTR(err);
 }
=20
 static void bpf_ringbuf_free(struct bpf_ringbuf *rb)
--=20
2.26.2