Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Smtp-Origin-Hostprefix: devvm
From:   Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Smtp-Origin-Hostname: devvm1096.prn0.facebook.com
To:     <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Smtp-Origin-Cluster: prn0c01
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 26/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 11:44:57 -0700
Message-ID: <20200727184506.2279656-27-guro@fb.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200727184506.2279656-1-guro@fb.com>
References: <20200727184506.2279656-1-guro@fb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 net/xdp/xskmap.c | 10 +---------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xdp/xskmap.c b/net/xdp/xskmap.c
index e574b22defe5..0366013f13c6 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xskmap.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xskmap.c
@@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ static void xsk_map_sock_delete(struct xdp_sock *xs,
=20
 static struct bpf_map *xsk_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
-	struct bpf_map_memory mem;
 	int err, numa_node;
 	struct xsk_map *m;
 	u64 size;
@@ -90,18 +89,11 @@ static struct bpf_map *xsk_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *=
attr)
 	numa_node =3D bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
 	size =3D struct_size(m, xsk_map, attr->max_entries);
=20
-	err =3D bpf_map_charge_init(&mem, size);
-	if (err < 0)
-		return ERR_PTR(err);
-
 	m =3D bpf_map_area_alloc(size, numa_node);
-	if (!m) {
-		bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+	if (!m)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	}
=20
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&m->map, attr);
-	bpf_map_charge_move(&m->map.memory, &mem);
 	spin_lock_init(&m->lock);
=20
 	return &m->map;
--=20
2.26.2