Received: by 2002:a25:ca44:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a65csp106870ybg; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:53:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfBxxFgne4h9GAC+/YnGSYv8vxrKdPnstTjSNMH2rCHHvIvCNg6SKpna9mx3N3D1MihWvq X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7e57:: with SMTP id z23mr9528179ejr.294.1595922822484; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:53:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1595922822; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vWcd2RRqZkzbWuLDEBCxN19hlytWWuAetmzOs3vq+u+6F28B5w5ddTqQmwl6FLlT+y rcAfdTwizEgAaye1HoISsA3au1fld+7dDSwljOMD7WwRW5qqanZtMTOERUCoeRlys2sL /ozUKAzQyRhkej3DNqXubKNlVq34Eb2slyxyrUGz+u0N/MIvfcx1EeUPahls3orZEGzS uY6CZ6tvfE1JDAZffqN1sa0KJf5B09hnZt3aTBxRphzQEY1t4vYSNEBkS/2aSEAdAO7F gZ+QnMEJjwrL62VxGIaA/+8LBPue/IhBRKmmHTZIdHHNhs27lpvXHKOQzRjMtChMd91v eJvw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:references:ironport-sdr:dkim-signature; bh=EVOhiq+Hmemde58EXCazs7DvajeIRXTrBEFNSFKOjtw=; b=0+MpImnEMvC8FMuE6B9KGojEq0Fh57CIbCzjqiha5R9vcWLGg4lfnWa5afZ7CsPV3h ahz8yFbxUHVJ9mDt0OETKAHtxYH/SQdQpNt8ObSs5j+jLpWLYCa8Vt0ELTK3EI5N2Hr0 Clh1ZqjaKe81YyrO/j8UKV3MKuzm1KeS67c+80BYqLWUe9ze8rALUWqZO9YtJ6YN7WOg Ql9EZj6X2NYxoiGzIr0w7Bx0+sdUlwOxmMvaZFy3O13gBWXUFE1LJtT211bDuQDAKThK svbX3xJq2IQA+olsOvSd3VDJv5+Da0id+zZ2XbJDg8uq+Y3ZlhRrm9TyyLX7zGnZvlvE PFIg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@microchip.com header.s=mchp header.b=0F5Yqp1j; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=microchip.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i8si6783531edv.172.2020.07.28.00.53.20; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@microchip.com header.s=mchp header.b=0F5Yqp1j; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=microchip.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727945AbgG1HxL (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 03:53:11 -0400 Received: from esa4.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]:19363 "EHLO esa4.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727777AbgG1HxJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 03:53:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1595922789; x=1627458789; h=references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=NCgo8E7J6iYnLWIERMFlSYi/bk1Up+lw+01foO6NU20=; b=0F5Yqp1jAklmivz/vNCKssuAbulqG7Z5+ZwT++553FjkVKlxRM42VvRv 2mETpFRaT4jG0Wmf9czmkdqraMszBj++BkvpzOMNVBffvKUi0hRZB/Vw5 +Ylonkwc8mpHCBm3oRM4UVMCK7fGrJ5Zl89piusxqFIy7w2TF48YinAGD zD4PxeZih6pRGUNqJByh1hJIQ5VzOmOkpwbZyzxjvIx+Iali3Nx+3mJWe NSpunRhOblc0SZPdfTD2TDZ/dJPSjoVjubPigmMyFcaBxX7D4n7BtjTX+ 9ZlVVTx/GM4iYF5ws/NqUpD+aA/gtGEkKp3lN0Ap+zUqJfEoBwuEjbncx g==; IronPort-SDR: 9hMqYVRNZCWWZDVzdqyMhx4ASsF6C1zwZ4sXT7yVaHqmywv54cblCX2voGCnD8re13oAqJ08Ed LiY1z0hRApHXgpfJew1Imemb3AzvreYokpHkAbR+VKhgeqeBtaV3C5kuc5G0KHQu0yWvuNHdnz EvmDv0100X8MnhDXlC8zs6CDB041m+WlxaSlKlEORLzuKjDjB2wwKEKWrcHBEYw5+91RnnIUV4 70ftEbXs/ahrXIFMInHaq40lA6jaRgh5c8jnDTQWMlXeArIlfL0tphuPza7XGjCXyix3M6ulN0 SqA= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,405,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="81493886" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa4.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 28 Jul 2020 00:53:08 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:52:21 -0700 Received: from soft-dev15.microsemi.net.microchip.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:53:06 -0700 References: <20200727112236.8199-1-lars.povlsen@microchip.com> <159587873833.1360974.11729154337431621644@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <159588781925.1360974.3928941757935200801@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> From: Lars Povlsen To: Stephen Boyd CC: Arnd Bergmann , Lars Povlsen , SoC Team , Steen Hegelund , Microchip Linux Driver Support , linux-clk , Linux ARM , , Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] clk: sparx5: Review changes In-Reply-To: <159588781925.1360974.3928941757935200801@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:53:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87tuxsf53z.fsf@soft-dev15.microsemi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Boyd writes: > Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2020-07-27 13:11:49) >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:39 PM Stephen Boyd wrote: >> > >> > Why was the clk driver merged to linux-next outside of the clk tree? Was >> > there some sort of dependency? >> >> I merged the entire series of the base platform support along with >> a few core drivers. I had asked for the series to be submitted to >> soc@kernel.org after all parts had been reviewed, but I missed that >> the clk driver was still missing maintainer review (I saw you had >> reviewed some patches, but apparently that was just the binding, >> not the driver). >> >> I rebased the 'arm/newsoc' branch the other day to fix another mistake, >> so if you prefer, I can rebase it again and drop the clk driver or >> all the sparx5 patches. >> > > Yes, please just drop the clk driver and I can pick it up for the next > merge window from the list and all the fixes can be rolled into one > patch. Sorry for all the commotion! With Stephen's comments I assume I don't have to submit anything new, at least not right now. Otherwise, please let me know. Cheers, -- Lars Povlsen, Microchip