Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 8D6D3C433C9
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the pci tree
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
References: <20200728154903.51a60b8e@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Sivaprakash Murugesan <sivaprak@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <c7c752bc-2a06-fc56-6f87-dfdddd8a436e@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:56:21 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200728154903.51a60b8e@canb.auug.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 7/28/2020 11:19 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
>
>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.txt
>
> between commits:
>
>    736ae5c91712 ("dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add missing clks")
>    b11b8cc161de ("dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add ext reset")
>    d511580ea9c2 ("dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add ipq8064 rev 2 variant")
>
> from the pci tree and commit:
>
>    70172d196947 ("dt-bindings: pci: convert QCOM pci bindings to YAML")
>
> from the devicetree tree.
>
> I don;t know how to fixed it up so I just left the latter one . This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Rob/Bjorn,

Please let me know if I can provide a patch rebased to linux-next.

Bjorn can pick up the patch after review and Rob can drop the old pci 
yaml conversion patch.

let me know your thoughts.

>