Received: by 2002:a17:90b:8d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ds16csp320412pjb; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 02:00:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZkoWDRml81yEBxDzkUsnHMiqKaOIhnUPga0LKOT7hpNHRjbNRCTL0/rRHUvow8aCSeUUC X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1544:: with SMTP id p4mr25566386edx.334.1595926804286; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 02:00:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1595926804; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JBpHlyW0kCRAapOkT+4JDUrdpayxKT4xHIPEOcA+/AktUpuDkHTpBFnzhmcr5BKnTM 29LlmtzMnBBJkTzCVayZGQ8hQllX2pFFWn6QulV6GIxoijCiIVjdB6EL5AysknajBmYW 7Y+WryYGnH46FXDXhGYybYZz2ByDhPdzJS/HeKVGajc0d+RHniENWbGF2PBTTNsGW2AO g6qUIfthaMHCsiBv68J7I+CKiK+xlvG3NBzyASgh+mp+7mlzBV4pyTnfM+Mh0Y+gI2rW TlnsEyNTkM3wx8xB4gnw8E56qFW1suAy4T+zI7clJ0AlhdXgdYZR3woOqbZL1qSGCuRh ZupQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=g2iu+QCMgXo2sAT2PlgYuqn3NjqPMtQtGppvStDwUPE=; b=CZ1BqgKJpylCkCqEUouy41vA5XJ+NtFcaylSQnEwSr1HrtXCHZzNQOg1oSdVhBT+CM 049zB1QhTENU2SDBkZOA8yMQDT5zDDIYwIOz2UoH58pFovEy3b6RNC9VXGK5Hn1xhxBD OxQW4r92yvmI1wAI0Gewc1a21NzMlixvX18sdBRvDQMbQrhdIQFJyJboFSKoitB0dByg 7Cht2SWNELvQkBKus5y0nm7bGnViMXVLlAyu9QGgViSpQo5TpWokbdhi8J/+ODkVBkrD OK25eC9w4fWJkYzPnWa9d4DlWYLssa1Qe/+QF4UZvNfBy+1v8w0nOXsU3hswHMvbnyjy 46/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@oracle.com header.s=corp-2020-01-29 header.b=tAh81aGE; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r24si7072800edp.282.2020.07.28.01.59.42; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 02:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@oracle.com header.s=corp-2020-01-29 header.b=tAh81aGE; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728296AbgG1I5f (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 04:57:35 -0400 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:53546 "EHLO userp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726032AbgG1I5f (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 04:57:35 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06S8v27H068443; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:57:24 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=g2iu+QCMgXo2sAT2PlgYuqn3NjqPMtQtGppvStDwUPE=; b=tAh81aGE6m22XiJtNJu46kyd6LUJKwYgqSAfh30pZxnKOIkMYvA1ul7oQMyJAEhEFKN/ ssDLycHG+IAh38HY99EZ6MB+MrIiltVB/hkg+733Ejni9W3PTyvGkZZ2eo3sUVaoOx0h 2hyIMdAwNfik2n0UmJcjpuPa1MBJ+bdwWpsamoRvkWQgI1jVuILselkLeWNdVcXewKNp ykbSVcIR3sFO+Fbe9aZWUH+PP/hLc6RgqVslOFP4XbTNruDCy4FM71cKXylPEyoO2S4l nA8NWcW8r+eL7L00W21sORJBuuuL0p1huyg9BR7iFGkEIIfe+/jjOTin0W7cmdV407KD 6A== Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 32hu1j68ag-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:57:24 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06S8qhKL136632; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:57:23 GMT Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 32hu5tunf3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:57:23 +0000 Received: from abhmp0018.oracle.com (abhmp0018.oracle.com [141.146.116.24]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 06S8vLQ8014135; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:57:21 GMT Received: from kadam (/41.57.98.10) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 01:57:20 -0700 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:57:12 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Peilin Ye Cc: Kashyap Desai , Sumit Saxena , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Shivasharan S , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] scsi/megaraid: Prevent kernel-infoleak in kioc_to_mimd() Message-ID: <20200728085712.GE2571@kadam> References: <20200727210235.327835-1-yepeilin.cs@gmail.com> <20200728084137.GC2571@kadam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200728084137.GC2571@kadam> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9695 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007280067 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9695 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007280068 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:41:37AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Generally, don't silence static checker warnings unless it makes the > code more readable. It's the checker writer's job to fix their own code. > In this case, that's me, but parsing the code is quite complicated and I > don't have a plan for how to fix it. Actually, looking at this some more, it's not so complicated. By this time next year hopefully this warning will be silenced. regards, dan carpenter