Received: by 2002:a25:ca44:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a65csp218957ybg; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 04:21:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4Tm7jsvcC7p42TdsYMGb+WOUyxEZcbRRZQ/VACXdyf7qw8j/Nbd9eud4YoJJCqzHboSHM X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b0d:: with SMTP id u13mr24599010ejg.342.1595935269197; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 04:21:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1595935269; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sMRnQuuinwIIwbpDM85SCtlEIYDDMw1fIk8NZB2pcqXRgIwjtlytmWA3W7Z6asTxVA 3HbtESKEKeL54F/KPTjODde8zIiIoxjETSMXxyt4n4vD3VioHJs05P8eq1V0nmSTt/m2 6RBo/4zmy+I+2PrndMbFoxECdZKjDkk11ratje2R88N2FvX88Q4VrPX2M6K42DEh5iVC oRPl0FKw5iXeeqmz5iPU3GDH/4Rnyr1nti5h9noJ5qAVyslX80+0irvqyxvOkP6OBTDm YlOwaVRpUlN3KpNu4lyVDhjpH0H9Jm96UTAGjEnYZ7JFeLRylPxnAfALIzVF4jtYrmMg GNEQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:message-id:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Muazobp+CoNoesOGLA1mVEIXf62DcclBDFYpySE7pm8=; b=bOnIhExN/IK7BAZYRFWQM+l2ocFoA6pnjdy9tBZ/XU9jC3mEgupG6i8/qZVQ9kJo6x xWDLb/uknVGOPWKG0EpKKsapwb2giszbNB4guf4TndIKy8xxvKF/gHSNnMp0b2CQn+Jz q6e4JC48lqvnCn6iYaWmtaps0+CWFoGd3UcmJAS2GraBwt+vo3DXNAcKo7JaJbdD9NoA G5+5WVkXv63nKygbFqEpuMWgIcS2L60kwR/xhP/OTZ71Kp9qUZxAO0I27W5sDf2bqJ8l LO7hMC8mz1yjWU6KRQkPF8s1VGAfNzcASDgK5VBkYZPf5qxQj91IH8+Ip3Bpk3nhWe0n 2NXA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=EsT3sVwL; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i16si7015540ejx.549.2020.07.28.04.20.46; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 04:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=EsT3sVwL; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729065AbgG1LTf (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:19:35 -0400 Received: from mail29.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.29]:58957 "EHLO mail29.static.mailgun.info" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729051AbgG1LTb (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:19:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1595935169; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=Muazobp+CoNoesOGLA1mVEIXf62DcclBDFYpySE7pm8=; b=EsT3sVwLyhw0+c8mRbAI2JjXK0iui03DyJ5XgEsA72d+A7MX4UGIAs3friaNRUJUOnmfzV0Q mtz0txLM50/QEVtSF+nAbAUhTRno3ql5udHDTW6/CPoszbAG2BkVy8jp3GMJhrbEJidmK5ta bhAZux+Bevoc42W0bLGKDhnghFU= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.122.29 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n06.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5f2009ab634c4259e399c917 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:19:07 GMT Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EB621C433B1; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:19:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sbhanu) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 859B0C433CA; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:19:05 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:49:05 +0530 From: sbhanu@codeaurora.org To: Matthias Kaehlcke Cc: adrian.hunter@intel.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org, Pradeep P V K , devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add bandwidth votes for eMMC and SDcard In-Reply-To: <20200727191029.GA3191083@google.com> References: <1595328381-29552-1-git-send-email-sbhanu@codeaurora.org> <20200724171018.GZ3191083@google.com> <7ffcb56e9e6723f4bae687e0f491cb93@codeaurora.org> <20200727191029.GA3191083@google.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: sbhanu@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020-07-28 00:40, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:20:38PM +0530, sbhanu@codeaurora.org wrote: >> On 2020-07-24 22:40, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: >> > Hi Shaik, >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:16:21PM +0530, Shaik Sajida Bhanu wrote: >> > > From: Pradeep P V K >> > > >> > > Add the bandwidth domain supporting performance state and >> > > the corresponding OPP tables for the sdhc device on sc7180. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K >> > > Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu >> > > --- >> > > >> > > Changes since V1: >> > > - Incorporated review comments by Bjorn Andersson. >> > > --- >> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++ >> > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) >> > > >> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi >> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi >> > > index 68f9894..d78a066 100644 >> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi >> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi >> > > @@ -684,6 +684,9 @@ >> > > clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>, >> > > <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>; >> > > clock-names = "core", "iface"; >> > > + interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_EMMC &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>, >> > > + <&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc SLAVE_EMMC_CFG>; >> > > + interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc"; >> > > power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>; >> > > operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc1_opp_table>; >> > > >> > > @@ -704,11 +707,15 @@ >> > > opp-100000000 { >> > > opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>; >> > > required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>; >> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <100000 100000>; >> > > + opp-avg-kBps = <100000 50000>; >> > > }; >> > > >> > > opp-384000000 { >> > > opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>; >> > > required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>; >> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <600000 900000>; >> > > + opp-avg-kBps = <261438 300000>; >> > > }; >> > > }; >> > > }; >> > > @@ -2476,6 +2483,10 @@ >> > > clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_APPS_CLK>, >> > > <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_AHB_CLK>; >> > > clock-names = "core", "iface"; >> > > + >> > > + interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_SDCC_2 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>, >> > > + <&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc SLAVE_SDCC_2>; >> > > + interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc"; >> > > power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>; >> > > operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc2_opp_table>; >> > > >> > > @@ -2489,11 +2500,15 @@ >> > > opp-100000000 { >> > > opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>; >> > > required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>; >> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <160000 100000>; >> > > + opp-avg-kBps = <80000 50000>; >> > > }; >> > > >> > > opp-202000000 { >> > > opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <202000000>; >> > > required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>; >> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <200000 120000>; >> > > + opp-avg-kBps = <100000 60000>; >> > > }; >> > > }; >> > > }; >> > >> > Does the sdhci-msm driver actually have BW scaling support at this >> > point? >> > >> >> yes >> >> > There is commit 4ece9795be56 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect >> > bandwidth scaling support"), whose commit message says "make sure >> > interconnect driver is ready before handling interconnect scaling.". >> > >> > I haven't seen any patch adding the scaling support (supposedly by >> > adding dev_pm_opp_set_bw() calls?). Did I miss it? If not it seems >> > it would make sense to post it in a series together with this patch, >> > as far as I can tell this patch alone does nothing in practical terms. >> > >> > grep sdhc /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary >> > 8804000.sdhci 0 0 0 >> > 7c4000.sdhci 0 0 0 >> > 7c4000.sdhci 0 0 0 >> > 8804000.sdhci 0 0 0 >> > ... >> >> "mmc: sdhci-msm: Use OPP API to set clk/perf >> state"(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/8/425) and "mmc: sdhci-msm: Add >> interconnect bandwidth scaling >> support"(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/12/60) >> with these two patches scaling will be supported for sdhci-msm driver. > > Are you testing with exactly these patches or with the ones that landed > upstream? At least the second one changed substantially > >> the values in grep sdhc >> /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary will be zero >> during >> device is in suspend state... > > Yes, I forgot to mention that I started MMC IO before looking at > 'interconnect_summary'. > >> and the values in grep sdhc >> /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary during device in >> resume >> state will be like the following:: >> >> cicalhost / # cat /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary >> | grep >> sdh >> 8804000.sdhci 0 60000 120000 >> 7c4000.sdhci 0 300000 900000 >> 7c4000.sdhci 0 300000 900000 >> 8804000.sdhci 0 60000 120000 >> 8804000.sdhci 0 100000 200000 >> 7c4000.sdhci 0 261438 600000 >> 8804000.sdhci 0 60000 120000 > > On my system the bandwidth is never set: > > 3.590152] sdhci_msm 7c4000.sdhci: DBG: old/new frequencies (384000000 > Hz) are same, nothing to do > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7.8/source/drivers/opp/core.c#L847 > > This happens every time, even after the bandwith is set to 0. The > problem > seems to be that opp_table->clk doesn't change for target_freq = 0. > > My system is based on v5.4, so it is possible that my kernel is missing > some > relevant patch from upstream. Hi matthias, In order to aviod confusion this patch is continuation of the below patch:: "mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect bandwidth scaling support" (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/9/160). Thanks, sajida