Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:01:00 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc:     kajoljain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
        "Paul A. Clarke" <pc@us.ibm.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/19] perf metric: Add support to reuse metric
Message-ID: <20200728130100.GE1243191@krava>
References: <20200719181320.785305-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
 <dbe59791-937d-de95-4ba0-c34e7a1cd273@linux.ibm.com>
 <20200720072237.GC760733@krava>
 <6cb72b48-5244-9faf-a9e5-67858c732b83@linux.ibm.com>
 <20200720081943.GE760733@krava>
 <dd465647-da63-c473-9944-bdfec2abe484@linux.ibm.com>
 <20200720191625.GL760733@krava>
 <20200728123955.GZ40195@kernel.org>
 <20200728125456.GD1243191@krava>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200728125456.GD1243191@krava>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 02:54:56PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 09:39:55AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:16:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 02:32:40PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On 7/20/20 1:49 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 01:39:24PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > SNIP
> > > > > 
> > > > >> This is with your perf/metric branch:
> > > > >> command# ./perf stat -M PowerBUS_Frequency -C 0 -I 1000
> > > > >> assertion failed at util/metricgroup.c:709
> > > > >> #           time             counts unit events
> > > > >>      1.000054545          7,807,505      hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=0/ #      2.0 GHz  PowerBUS_Frequency_0
> > > > >>      1.000054545          7,807,485      hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=1/                                   
> > > > >>      2.000232761          7,807,500      hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=0/ #      2.0 GHz  PowerBUS_Frequency_0
> > > > >>      2.000232761          7,807,478      hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=1/                                   
> > > > >>      3.000363762          7,799,665      hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=0/ #      1.9 GHz  PowerBUS_Frequency_0
> > > > >>      3.000363762          7,807,502      hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=1/                                   
> > > > >> ^C     3.259418599          2,022,150      hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=0/ #      0.5 GHz  PowerBUS_Frequency_0
> > > > >>      3.259418599          2,022,164      hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=1/                                   
> > > > >>
> > > > >>  Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
> > > > >>
> > > > >>         25,436,820      hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=0/ #      6.4 GHz  PowerBUS_Frequency_0
> > > > >>         25,444,629      hv_24x7/pm_pb_cyc,chip=1/                                   
> > > > >>
> > > > >>        3.259505529 seconds time elapsed
> > > > > 
> > > > > I found the bug, we are not adding runtime metrics as standalone ones,
> > > > > but as referenced metrics.. will fix and try to add test for that
> > > > > 
> > > > > as for testing.. do I need some special ppc server to have support for this? 
> > > > 
> > > > Hi jiri,
> > > >     We need power9 lpar machine and need to make sure `CONFIG_HV_PERF_CTRS` is
> > > > enabled.
> > > 
> > > could you please try with following patch on top?
> > 
> > So, can you point me to the cset that this should be merged into? Or can
> > it come as a separate patch? I'll put what I have in the tmp.perf/core
> > branch, and will do testing, please let me know if you want to fold it
> > or as a followup patch.
> 
> sorry for delay.. I planned to squash the change in, but if you already
> pushed something out, I'll rebase on top, I will post new version tomorrow
> 
> 1st 7 patches are good to go in any case

ok, I just saw it's pushed out, I'll post a patch on top of it

jirka