Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200727122242.32337-1-vadym.kochan@plvision.eu>
 <20200727122242.32337-4-vadym.kochan@plvision.eu> <CAHp75Vcaa0-s6FEUw0YqoEDi=uVRcJiDvwA+ye4cNxwkK6eb+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200728123006.GA10391@plvision.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20200728123006.GA10391@plvision.eu>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:24:42 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcdpwqpRqm99aHivTkEsxF6-4SENVz09oV=JJTjh8eyVA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next v4 3/6] net: marvell: prestera: Add basic devlink support
To:     Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@plvision.eu>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur@plvision.eu>,
        Serhiy Boiko <serhiy.boiko@plvision.eu>,
        Serhiy Pshyk <serhiy.pshyk@plvision.eu>,
        Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.mytnyk@plvision.eu>,
        Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@plvision.eu>,
        Andrii Savka <andrii.savka@plvision.eu>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mickey Rachamim <mickeyr@marvell.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 3:30 PM Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@plvision.eu> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 04:07:07PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 3:23 PM Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@plvision.eu> wrote:

...

> > > +       err = devlink_register(dl, sw->dev->dev);
> > > +       if (err) {
> > > +               dev_warn(sw->dev->dev, "devlink_register failed: %d\n", err);
> > > +               return err;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       return 0;
> >
> >   if (err)
> >     dev_warn(...);
> >
> >   return err;
> Would not it better to have 'return 0' at the end to visually indicate
> the success point ?

Up to you. Actually just noticed that you are using dev_warn() for
error. It should be dev_err().

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko